From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.zeus03.de (zeus03.de [194.117.254.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F849286421 for ; Mon, 19 May 2025 15:14:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747667678; cv=none; b=Rzvh1Acne80EbX0RThAd1dkpuZ6GEVw9fnwz6Fh3kpeJHVWue81rARqL8rstrLGx3LPGcGG+E4o7Ej/g2U4Z/Elbxgi51l7l81YnePX/mQ41Jtio0XqmkpEjcq616CC/ec26Hxb28LaEaT2jyRA9GcnDrTIzM3U8F07Jrwvm2/c= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747667678; c=relaxed/simple; bh=qNVVWenUO4XWo/JHN6YcXvLpUtMhhiMFX5R1egOkoa4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=D6ioO9tv7Ot1r6s5jUkbq2q69fzv64tAoS17LzS3RL94lSZXYaM00tZJz37a0Dc6gzXAUcYIErv1jIAofMKnxFecH+PcrHfYkgpIaTFJ3u4zZyNpAL4MrCBJm9L/Lm4jiElLbKlcEJFFa5kJS011bbcfduVHJEoCACZAE1E0OoA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b=g74IFDW5; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b="g74IFDW5" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= sang-engineering.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=k1; bh=qNVV WenUO4XWo/JHN6YcXvLpUtMhhiMFX5R1egOkoa4=; b=g74IFDW5kTkYT00I3rBN 8r5S/M9tsSKrF+Ot7+LtGNVvcwqFTXHJOrZiRm+jRoDUsEHZMlL8CLMVIXJcZZSg 3o5VyRr2Bz43P/4OPZ5g+BQ0oYyTdVSszHySgmQARSs4DEwMxAc0eOuTdwPExQ6c 6d7MWXs/yE24PRrQnh/jMEIEf9px0OH1ppT8u6D4RaYGLa7ZE5m7lrhVyMM1ujRP Yw7DGIDmMJkJI5j0KKJdbuDDBssmfsIEa4y/9DIkM5QamVq5+czKDGOkUZ7qkHQU boCkKuGTbFG7V/rUWfTxASAGpD7KDr6dT/eY0k4J0APhBIVT7sVXHzUUunqec57c aw== Received: (qmail 2536472 invoked from network); 19 May 2025 17:14:33 +0200 Received: by mail.zeus03.de with UTF8SMTPSA (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted, authenticated); 19 May 2025 17:14:33 +0200 X-UD-Smtp-Session: l3s3148p1@RgO+ln41mJxZz6uL Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 17:14:31 +0200 From: Wolfram Sang To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Alim Akhtar , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] arm64: dts: exynos: use proper node names for GPIO based I2C busses Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Wolfram Sang , Krzysztof Kozlowski , linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Alim Akhtar , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org References: <20250519121512.5657-1-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> <20250519121512.5657-2-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> <006ee7d6-1289-4f4a-819d-9a5e5120db99@kernel.org> <3f6e1b74-5d19-4194-b98b-91ab6f10446c@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="N50p7v0rMXI5QQZ1" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3f6e1b74-5d19-4194-b98b-91ab6f10446c@kernel.org> --N50p7v0rMXI5QQZ1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline > ... so clearly the suffix is "-foo" or "-0", as we usually prefer. This > should be replaced into i2c-X, by dropping "gpio", instead of using less > favored suffixing (one without -). Hmm, I can't automate this because it will then need to be aligned with the bus numbering of other existing non-GPIO-busses. Which is highly individual per board. That means we need to drop this series? --N50p7v0rMXI5QQZ1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAmgrStcACgkQFA3kzBSg KbYZUQ//RQF+ICoSYNeA3SyfK3l3mO5YkFWpb1eSl1CAHUe3Bdh1xCjyYZUIa8aF v42eWw6HeFyz/+CUAUcM2+YCoYc8wdrQtdg8MnTgieCzd3c83h6LmaKfZd39VxJY iqPJ/hj9vFjd98/s3XtWXflp4Lj9MYcbMds/BJDUz4R3C0lxCr+RjOSrJsk2ElZn PTYx3W99n3jXAVdEb4TQbeC1Vy86wCC+kalPAZhLsmks2tWCBC7a7MBqqNNDmQwk 7+ACg1UYA3hBKrba8/DmxMIHGyhneP/aEwLjQv4hH4Z6GFQZYZ+jotqz0wdVfGgh WYKtqFVKrZYzHm7KQ0P0uh1iguOzQwVFLvdtzSHeytmSRp1adWr8UgiA3WmJOuf1 3CvIPZv/SjRvD3l1Fcv5cfiiGjKGtX1tAf9uPICQUQOqJ5skuoNWP+HCrvm9vpqn L6G8Yv/wQNqutzaCYiw2b3mU1NFbpLqEuLyzGjG3wPdo2uhFeGVP6YxIK92n6Ixb hJecCPgi2hbsUi1JbY4AlcwPOQaKLGTX4LtZjxFHaqeNqVp1ZZ79lK5mXWt1P9tT k2FoqxvvPaikH9HUKjPDQU3ukjFfC4ixmMJh9XZcpGMcw/dCeD3H9qKxCPW/XF2c eGIptUSzBXjTXZCqAM6XQbm0HS/nQhwJ3HAS2rAwHveXAuotLx8= =ri5t -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --N50p7v0rMXI5QQZ1--