From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.zeus03.de (zeus03.de [194.117.254.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 098B82147E7 for ; Thu, 12 Jun 2025 09:54:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1749722087; cv=none; b=Ovv2QAAQXBI1Pnbi7zdhwGiS6x8r25sCbe/gIQPTgbi4k+JRt1A+u/iTUL5j9ncWrIlJFio/zThNwZprFEV98npxu0wlw/ucuSrACPZYl94f7EN3YU7VqRK/UiO5UY2sRY9itty/rjCJpJ9/xNLMprJBAwQSKMLKlhhAVYbgIGA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1749722087; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Mer6qGMAyp8EPWtGukSzsuJDZTrkYf5FnFWHqQ9ONuo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=sQI+Mh8hQEBbWDi+e1E2uomoBqYIYW0xDGmSHyo+QYQHuV0NG/ZsK/7xL4YdHYPleaiVkDydHcUFeA3G7lrd27mHJ+77ms+c6giNek1MiOcZRm0o2BfXSncgd7xcj2kXVU47KrDEj4QPrEsbS7r3NNMHxN/RJSZlBg7RxbmwFEE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b=RlPFGNvf; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b="RlPFGNvf" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= sang-engineering.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=k1; bh=Mer6 qGMAyp8EPWtGukSzsuJDZTrkYf5FnFWHqQ9ONuo=; b=RlPFGNvfMPgncelkj25I qs3/7isR9NSt1VjTlfOcMicbj9GlJCRQdolbZo4N6pvDbZEvcQ3eRlON/kTRIPot 4KvvmCFYd11wjqg7vDgNCA5f+/eHQveyyNJiPijgnTKJYd7Slk9DkYKYncDu3X07 IxsXn0ArHFElnhIOM42bg1qYFPKmmwrB2WyYUdKHqgi37eA5xpxTyeBMC+mh+3Vg m7ZtLlKel38jBr3x2nidl7BTHJ/Hbs07skrAi5P9FxzRq8DPAQ4Gu5SdjlBQ3GLP tb+MXwSun8QiCBmcW5V/wMs4t+CwUdpIplSCwU7zCzuowqKZoXnIQdWr1Vx6yYg4 Sw== Received: (qmail 3578304 invoked from network); 12 Jun 2025 11:54:36 +0200 Received: by mail.zeus03.de with UTF8SMTPSA (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted, authenticated); 12 Jun 2025 11:54:36 +0200 X-UD-Smtp-Session: l3s3148p1@SrHL6lw3DMUgAwDPXy2/ACpZfVCNKldR Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2025 11:54:35 +0200 From: Wolfram Sang To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Alim Akhtar , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, Herve Codina Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] arm64: dts: exynos: use proper node names for GPIO based I2C busses Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Wolfram Sang , Krzysztof Kozlowski , linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Alim Akhtar , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, Herve Codina References: <006ee7d6-1289-4f4a-819d-9a5e5120db99@kernel.org> <3f6e1b74-5d19-4194-b98b-91ab6f10446c@kernel.org> <1cea4f55-752f-4581-a003-1c9d31a36039@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BMGydgXgrD79q+F7" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: --BMGydgXgrD79q+F7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250519184530.21845-1-wsa+renesas@sang-engin= eering.com >=20 > I see my approach of using generic i2c-X was also preferred by Rob, so I > guess it won't get it. Okay, if you guys say so... > I sent patch for Samsung, with reported-by credits for you (it's also > reported now by my tests and earlier by Rob's as well, though). I will fix the AT91-based Calao boards somewhen, and then I consider this case closed for me. Thank you both for guidance! --BMGydgXgrD79q+F7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAmhKo9gACgkQFA3kzBSg KbZ38w/+Pgyysh+5Rz9SxTN1/5OcN6oGorrscECqMPM1RTIqYe1tp0eucb1rQUTd g++TSOgXe9g5MBko5wyGbEDKTFda00FcmFAYJhdVjb//xbNncxB4YB+UKmgqqpRe Q0cEUKVl+2DOTjTv7phant58+H8f3fa72Y70SYQsdbZW117LxWZ1RGY/zMoNoY9k wOiGxaUm7EjG3mPh9cyCyG694h8pV9vsq+3B/xgkLiPo8tR9vR+azwZAd0Uo/3AG q4JaRyC4VlxQ2oSy5+5uaDwwkaWONylQIck6AhmVgf/dFksx4IPjOpKxSfvp5C/Q vc5nxE4Vi0UAFTxoDTB9w7Dp4AokqUsGiFXGzmPCamor8dETqCFGfzkHwzSk+Bmj sWPnpa+T6g6L3oPx4LsAKn+Jq9KJCF+Ms+loXSOQjoq0gxbLXM8/vC+K2a19TVFj ucCcgZQM0/WuX9Q4N7cSGQCHgoyuiiMdzel7i1PEVBtJ8ZZ+QGc+96d8YUPuPlpN aXdI7zGpmPFcsvwwMkt8KSclfZqYNoLx2rDXI52q1ERfQEPLt6TH8zVHohu/Hh4n hJZVco+mIvlUv2panmH6tP5qbYOilaevnyFa4ugnecpt8YfzvxknWwhdpbxwtXTw IjcWfwh0bshNPv8vzSt+XPRaiW1QFLH5Lipc7m/Jr4IxbRNOEXs= =IiEt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BMGydgXgrD79q+F7--