From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from proxy41135.mail.163.com (proxy25215.mail.163.com [103.129.252.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6440123CE; Mon, 30 Jun 2025 03:47:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.129.252.15 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751255234; cv=none; b=G+RWZrbtNCcT5d7P7ejvLwiOiMTRL/bfbGh8f++6ii7f8ob3vATJNbtVIOzRVofqrOivFr/93Agj5UrkcXfjAeLMgyd/Kx1nd3juXbaEA2CRrY6PnVe952JCq9esgZPS5sjjtz87E8BS8Dt6piaDkigchFe66YzXmu6iJHphlCA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751255234; c=relaxed/simple; bh=nz/6V9DH4cKVb4lElTTDh2PykRGAK5Z38f16mJFADDg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=WaboyzlYMjq0fG3RQR7/woQT2ie8w7iadCQCO4KyiUIvf7ebQ9x2gZ1IyHdctdiv3vBbiK4IfGAdhVVnL4utHbklKC8mXcenRq6Ict8yo/61ZxDMq9z07Ig0AEol8ip7xBlmUu5Wo0Oo2w70WlDFHIKAEmIYtjwSE/xzkwSm3Y0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=yeah.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=yeah.net; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=yeah.net header.i=@yeah.net header.b=gvVCSYMT; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.129.252.15 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=yeah.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=yeah.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=yeah.net header.i=@yeah.net header.b="gvVCSYMT" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yeah.net; s=s110527; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type; bh=qdncWhYOth4XsRh697dCBi3DdkMHRax6Ejf9OY8OaFU=; b=gvVCSYMTCNoxNh/h6g8VWMVoFtxUr7hJIEcpiUCa1SM+RyIi9/56dcfsrqM8kG jg+Q6EPq+v4M1GIa4Kgx1Wt9RXTyzDCcknDaS9p1F9GSMhOvsMb8jjqYHtC6e0++ advQTP0riI22qgS3Fq/zsrJJVcnw/hA6RciTrNSfTjI/o= Received: from dragon (unknown []) by gzsmtp3 (Coremail) with SMTP id M88vCgAnnw4RBmJouQnOAQ--.13995S3; Mon, 30 Jun 2025 11:35:47 +0800 (CST) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2025 11:35:45 +0800 From: Shawn Guo To: Wei Fang Cc: robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, shawnguo@kernel.org, s.hauer@pengutronix.de, kernel@pengutronix.de, festevam@gmail.com, Frank.Li@nxp.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] update NETC node of i.MX95 Message-ID: References: <20250528083433.3861625-1-wei.fang@nxp.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250528083433.3861625-1-wei.fang@nxp.com> X-CM-TRANSID:M88vCgAnnw4RBmJouQnOAQ--.13995S3 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1Uf129KBjDUn29KB7ZKAUJUUUUU529EdanIXcx71UUUUU7v73 VFW2AGmfu7bjvjm3AaLaJ3UbIYCTnIWIevJa73UjIFyTuYvjxUeksqDUUUU X-CM-SenderInfo: pvkd40hjxrjqh1hdxhhqhw/1tbiCQ98ZWhh4l2X2QABsm On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 04:34:30PM +0800, Wei Fang wrote: > We found that NETC has an overshoot issue, so the drive strength of the > related pins needs to be reduced. The first two patches are used to fix > this issue. The third patch adds SMMU support for NETC. > > Wei Fang (3): > arm64: dts: imx95-19x19-evk: fix the overshoot issue of NETC > arm64: dts: imx95-15x15-evk: fix the overshoot issue of NETC > arm64: dts: imx95: add SMMU support for NETC Applied all, thanks!