From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Brian Mak <makb@juniper.net>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"kexec@lists.infradead.org" <kexec@lists.infradead.org>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] x86/kexec: Carry forward the boot DTB on kexec
Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2025 12:05:26 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aI7gBld/+yKQ2EXM@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5A9FE2FF-800A-4458-9929-124EB89FE1D9@juniper.net>
On 08/01/25 at 07:24pm, Brian Mak wrote:
> On Jul 31, 2025, at 8:02 PM, Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > On 07/29/25 at 11:21am, Brian Mak wrote:
> >> The kexec_file_load syscall on x86 currently does not support passing
> >> a device tree blob to the new kernel.
> >>
> >> To add support for this, we copy the behavior of ARM64 and PowerPC and
> >> copy the current boot's device tree blob for use in the new kernel. We
> >> do this on x86 by passing the device tree blob as a setup_data entry in
> >> accordance with the x86 boot protocol.
> >
> > I see how, but no why. Why do we need to add DTB for x86?
>
> Hi Baoquan,
>
> Thanks for your comment. Some embedded x86 systems, such as ours at
> Juniper, use device trees. Currently, the x86 kexec_file_load syscall
> has no support for passing the device tree to the new kernel, which is a
> problem for us since we use kexec for some software upgrade related
> features. Not passing a device tree to the new kernel would cause a boot
> failure here.
Thanks for the info. Please add these into patch log to let reviewers
know them. We don't add code w/o objective.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-03 4:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-29 18:21 [PATCH RESEND] x86/kexec: Carry forward the boot DTB on kexec Brian Mak
2025-07-30 7:31 ` Dave Young
2025-07-30 17:02 ` Brian Mak
2025-07-31 9:27 ` Dave Young
2025-08-01 0:24 ` Brian Mak
2025-08-01 3:02 ` Baoquan He
2025-08-01 19:24 ` Brian Mak
2025-08-03 4:05 ` Baoquan He [this message]
2025-08-05 23:12 ` Brian Mak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aI7gBld/+yKQ2EXM@MiWiFi-R3L-srv \
--to=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=makb@juniper.net \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox