From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.zeus03.de (zeus03.de [194.117.254.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63DF01607AC for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2025 04:04:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1754021070; cv=none; b=IGezjKeaD3xMKQqcnmHPf8UFep5upt1PrxXnHTJxS+aWUirQEi9El3eI30/iwOEf/HWv0iQtXXV6ConWoOnrOwPR8eQ6zXsY1BfTnK8GVHZX1KMbGL3UODmtIXjFSzqE21u26fHcg2uAFwti/d5QJcwgvW9IWWuT5OH7CXSZiH0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1754021070; c=relaxed/simple; bh=XYdMDXXIAN7HbChd9z5ogJJvvzHBD2bI+Yr2tfByadE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=KGrKWmawW/Ax0thnhq2orJjTISMISJp0M2Uq7ZMViIPrtQOsS1lidwKLl+rZ2CY9ubZACUTIgTiG8rhjA4PmbJSG5fmaGweG7p9vA6Coq+x6tJ3939Ml5oymKHMkqzgUe6j0+osk+Mw0pLQmdn57GQOfh7IjFqP3m94r0PKwwJc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b=MYIcTC3M; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b="MYIcTC3M" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= sang-engineering.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=k1; bh=XYdM DXXIAN7HbChd9z5ogJJvvzHBD2bI+Yr2tfByadE=; b=MYIcTC3M/p77FBqHQ45H v15j/z9Kp9JAUuZ6H63iG/EacYjagMnW0b9YWHuLrc/ohIM4aH0VE/jSKgT8TQ9J YCM3xm+WC2Eag4logbkTvPnkQLHdQr0ZpXMs7b1hrimkKPGjwH+o2lI27OoTVVu0 y2Y7ooIJPYbGqA6RI/qNEd0ncTn80Qmo26LUJejpqi83ECf6iNjKK4NVdjTCJvRo qv7DZEYn1mP4ar7/o/3E2Z/975oDK5XEZtOKZeKXuraqxLkdN5gBnfV8XLFOY5sl ZPugiD51lSUQ7JVdWoj6bJ5ayWAxQIpIv72rSqGr9JnsjYXysM1Cgo9Dxzujlot0 Cw== Received: (qmail 596081 invoked from network); 1 Aug 2025 06:04:26 +0200 Received: by mail.zeus03.de with UTF8SMTPSA (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted, authenticated); 1 Aug 2025 06:04:26 +0200 X-UD-Smtp-Session: l3s3148p1@DseN2kU7OK8ujnum Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2025 06:04:24 +0200 From: Wolfram Sang To: Prabhakar Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck , Guenter Roeck , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Philipp Zabel , Geert Uytterhoeven , Magnus Damm , linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, Biju Das , Fabrizio Castro , Lad Prabhakar Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/9] watchdog: rzv2h_wdt: Make "oscclk" an optional clock Message-ID: References: <20250729155915.67758-1-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> <20250729155915.67758-5-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OSE0N7soVdSM/wrO" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250729155915.67758-5-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> --OSE0N7soVdSM/wrO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 04:59:10PM +0100, Prabhakar wrote: > From: Lad Prabhakar >=20 > Update the driver to obtain the "oscclk" clock using > devm_clk_get_optional_prepared() instead of devm_clk_get_prepared(). > This allows the driver to handle cases where the "oscclk" clock is not > present in the hardware or device tree. >=20 > This change is in preparation for adding support for the RZ/T2H SoC, > which does not provide the "oscclk" clock. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang --OSE0N7soVdSM/wrO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAmiMPMgACgkQFA3kzBSg KbYvxw//W+TWCYkowRrzMlYt+yeUWLxQnY4QmCOoV3S5gn+cVAZoihCIqp7swIFX llexmBxOEkdh7g8+XD28nKrOSslanY6h7BjQDwHZm2IHzMeaj+2Pl9Did8fNLFnu DqZ1V7NDtCJuUJZoHFFgEg0UqZho42oYNTYOWhiXcPvYY/ydYjSBpyvdGKxq2kuO Z+cepFrB7+LwjGGl8msvNSi4YDZo50o754D+PqFWcZpaJV+bUD2VeMu0YKljlp6p 0l+3ZVn6Q+70Qajc+Vp5a3TTVQP+WMJ/Maoo25cluyFPcJZj0xVM0IU6BLGp7hVd Q4SHPQ0YPullFJunEKWDIQFrZN+k4pxEofZl2z7WywRdc0c8OmSZ1WF5jIIm6ewy 9wH5IJ2HWUWWTehFhnhICY8I8pLKy+NUJ1CkTrB/No4ro8usfDLI3X/vpag2HpPZ Cha9yMwdJJAvAL4BF+MBqN4o/EAN5AvE8Em9xBeEgwIsuGiZpb+/eFiqLWlD5PNq SVnkg2eYZLyxrzVNMvPWP6pTFL19401NBj+TplrHK3a6FktW7BiQK4HHfZDmss2U 5o6DQbndVA8AJWDFJcwKcQ5y30deP5jCHgSrpcUCBz0XAcjblMtiy3Dpy97CfESm naTRVxwWrlojdG0qq3Cig2NhMHWi5rAhPq9zcYUCIoOeU8XYgTY= =4c3K -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OSE0N7soVdSM/wrO--