From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 558272F7ABF; Fri, 5 Sep 2025 16:19:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757089190; cv=none; b=pCQjDyGxJj6KMPsER8rtC6w77vtNbqdCsYcjFzbTCe7Y2v9FQYKVNga2mg2I+HDwI3h06lMWj1V4XQwXruOTfilxkBr0kmY+Hxkph+8G2E+F01+JJmZNmOD3wjasu+uMGxInhpMklS382LvT1qLQvLxniGV/Uw6wV27WrV90wK8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757089190; c=relaxed/simple; bh=4hbd2XwoLVVA/f+86Q5KT4OHBRHzD7m8e0OymCmsTgs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=UqKrTp5Q8QIhPMIYGXRnhqoVJgoMgW1YH9Jt/SZGWHfMAiwRH8jMMQE+t15d5e6ptCtJmKXhTLoBYr1wvR8p3xQaTDy67mWLFvj4Ajk1JMdV0VfO7rs3Ilxd9gRNVjFGaw7114e7JEbqkPDqgE+XdbeCNBjRjDPydggA+RutSgg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA7DF152B; Fri, 5 Sep 2025 09:19:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e133380.arm.com (e133380.arm.com [10.1.197.68]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 654D73F63F; Fri, 5 Sep 2025 09:19:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2025 17:19:34 +0100 From: Dave Martin To: James Morse Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, D Scott Phillips OS , carl@os.amperecomputing.com, lcherian@marvell.com, bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com, tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, Jamie Iles , Xin Hao , peternewman@google.com, dfustini@baylibre.com, amitsinght@marvell.com, David Hildenbrand , Rex Nie , Koba Ko , Shanker Donthineni , fenghuay@nvidia.com, baisheng.gao@unisoc.com, Jonathan Cameron , Rob Herring , Rohit Mathew , Rafael Wysocki , Len Brown , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Hanjun Guo , Sudeep Holla , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Danilo Krummrich Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/33] drivers: base: cacheinfo: Add helper to find the cache size from cpu+level Message-ID: References: <20250822153048.2287-1-james.morse@arm.com> <20250822153048.2287-3-james.morse@arm.com> <2ac66605-ee6a-495b-a0fb-910926abd8b0@arm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2ac66605-ee6a-495b-a0fb-910926abd8b0@arm.com> Hi, On Wed, Aug 27, 2025 at 06:11:43PM +0100, James Morse wrote: > Hi Dave, > > On 27/08/2025 11:46, Dave Martin wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Fri, Aug 22, 2025 at 03:29:43PM +0000, James Morse wrote: > >> MPAM needs to know the size of a cache associated with a particular CPU. > >> The DT/ACPI agnostic way of doing this is to ask cacheinfo. > >> > >> Add a helper to do this. > > >> diff --git a/include/linux/cacheinfo.h b/include/linux/cacheinfo.h [...] > >> +static inline unsigned int get_cpu_cacheinfo_size(int cpu, int level) > >> +{ > >> + struct cacheinfo *ci = get_cpu_cacheinfo_level(cpu, level); > >> + > >> + return ci ? ci->size : 0; > >> +} > >> + > > > > Orphaned function? > > > > Can fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c:rdtgroup_cbm_to_size() be ported to use this? > > If so, this wouldn't just be dead code in this series. > > Ah - I thought the MPAM driver was pulling this value in, but its the resctrl glue code. > I was trying to reduce the number of trees this touches - its probably best to kick this > into the next series that adds the resctrl code as its pretty trivial. > > > Thanks, > > James > Fair enough. Cheers ---Dave