From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.zeus03.de (zeus03.de [194.117.254.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87F3D306D23 for ; Fri, 19 Sep 2025 09:34:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758274497; cv=none; b=skcjb6CLd0gVIMLjdCwPE37nN2f2vZ1z6QRnKumZrnLnnGT0f2hIC1j018tMk4bXHSl2iIaJTRMyf04ug18XnNIIQAIX6ARh6+DGO3lsMoQ1Wl/oWvdvm0pDKGS+zL4x+7muFi69nKrHnizh/8jqwrtESScMnRkDW6Q6gOQ2wGA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758274497; c=relaxed/simple; bh=2BdxvO+LipVZeGNgRKipvDky26JtE7RkzgLeGlqZKQM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=V9gx5hi9kM7y7d7XFwT5ZEBfUaf3WV5Pt/XrODqwteEgbJJng7iKDFn/wUf/UNCwOJYuuKy1TMS/oUWSPveoxPoz0Qh5cXYKia0ubp/W5p3n8G/IUmrUPs0ZfXU/juUfm388wEl+28+o+PViaGo+26Z0iVcSyXwGbUguoN2Lk7s= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b=R8FLyzgk; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b="R8FLyzgk" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= sang-engineering.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=k1; bh=JncH VkJM8tsT4MR8AdGnli8kK73nfD/36fL18vXO7C0=; b=R8FLyzgkDcm/d4hyYFYW iWvwCAvlNyuEv+CZdMqWnPELgsoJvxV/I2nVjyr4drJ5cbKaJUi4V3nxkkS7IQmK n4jgzYOn00Ew3pKGh16OIQla2fZ5a3L3noNGjnYdhXmVuXFuX5KZ6a6X2i0eSNOV iIGPSC0lB2oYnDaFawb1R9Ga3yNoiOFMc7VyXBTYPZFI1+UKWN3cJL7Cch32feT0 7XH4kzHmWTb80hNOqfQzQnb/kPH846mb/EyNZmz0Ktgu5L7av6t5btfJv9JqjUi8 60p2VLT+zmmfhY06eUhrZuOVchmC6fL8ejWGC+xNzom7xdCxgpNH2GL+ODJ5hV/R Ww== Received: (qmail 3862907 invoked from network); 19 Sep 2025 11:34:51 +0200 Received: by mail.zeus03.de with UTF8SMTPSA (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted, authenticated); 19 Sep 2025 11:34:51 +0200 X-UD-Smtp-Session: l3s3148p1@rb97LiQ/HpAujns7 Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2025 11:34:51 +0200 From: Wolfram Sang To: "Herve Codina (Schneider Electric)" Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Hoan Tran , Linus Walleij , Bartosz Golaszewski , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Geert Uytterhoeven , Magnus Damm , Saravana Kannan , Serge Semin , Phil Edworthy , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, Pascal Eberhard , Miquel Raynal , Thomas Petazzoni Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/8] dt-bindings: soc: renesas: Add the Renesas RZ/N1 GPIO Interrupt Multiplexer Message-ID: References: <20250918104009.94754-1-herve.codina@bootlin.com> <20250918104009.94754-7-herve.codina@bootlin.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="JK9kzNSXnbkqaaBc" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250918104009.94754-7-herve.codina@bootlin.com> --JK9kzNSXnbkqaaBc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline > + interrupt-map: > + description: > + Specifies the mapping from external GPIO interrupt lines to the output > + interrupts. The array items have to be ordered with the first item > + related to the output line 0 (IRQ 103), the next one to the output line 1 > + (IRQ 104) and so on up to the output line 8 (IRQ 110). maxItems 8? > + /* > + * The child interrupt number is computed using the following formula: > + * gpio_bank * 32 + gpio_number > + * > + * with: > + * - gpio_bank: The GPIO bank number > + * - 0 for GPIO0A, > + * - 1 for GPIO1A, > + * - 2 for GPIO2A > + * - gpio_number: Number of the gpio in the bank (0..31) > + */ I wonder if this comment wouldn't be better in the interrupt-map description above? --JK9kzNSXnbkqaaBc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAmjNI7cACgkQFA3kzBSg KbZCcxAAgxPZf4AePiR6qG8VJErIxYZXJ1X3aC0TU9YmDAjfdJjijyML5QKP2j5z qz2qBimHfUWZWH66HbxU3ymVo1ruY8SROMQ5RqoORL53KYqQiKI9ewc73F3eIkzf eYXHtulP7jMZ8xrKxYV1PNgUhxhgfigEkS5oDzT7oh8azv23JJmDrGbh7Q3EPxqH /XCaKwWOlE5MlZVeTWCfhbTW1V86kPxZcjF+41vqIsExpIZZgdD2hYVZphg7r3KM Zvby6ndv81+EFMwuhO6DfXX+cKCoPsG3X4V6+zUdpa2ApgtHSbD2dxkF6WgZ6UmQ fvLjcqlsyi+JeUOqcPAO/jtY+lqcavocbr58QrqHH0bdWrfhMWjfGiXvPNbeliuv mixY07nFnF986HrXWVC4HXpiODeclvaAQFmKV8HoJFeEAahfGMiDqb58wSF3JL50 n8BV0ipFoW/jMv66UVXRsGnM4EJxakBd5x7mwNbUKXhCLtBqeL3Y75sPe8Qtx3cF nCjb86/jsSWz18tiHyr0RAOxEf8GVM3zTj+JBpgf9bJ5xgT/aDeDRDvyqXHph4MO pY4PO3CdIkcihfPmyJ0/EBQurc9DPmR3iHNjYReo/GIGaHsEy9RMwCu4zvS3/BfZ BhfUkl5WjtB+OKJYSVBqr/DScKbQRk8XVEC7ZKCzrrK7ieWQwuY= =mFbO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --JK9kzNSXnbkqaaBc--