From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.zeus03.de (zeus03.de [194.117.254.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDBD52773E4 for ; Wed, 10 Sep 2025 11:17:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757503074; cv=none; b=txXjBt28tdQLHaWDD0leoWk1BlUJyw0yRyG6tUZJMqoqiVXlmAGhbND1Zz7wdzn2rAADTjt/k2vw+aYdWAIvXP6/FbSOJdoXBkbOwogN8GgSrC8pRyNy6eeK9MQq2rI1H9QHHbwVEQ5Q3mv6TTuXh8FhefilNfVpbe5Eu/dPFhI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757503074; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Xtb/sLzI5bW8Bo35Swpy28juwuCbw+RUPfTq/h5670o=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=puqwsXirhl/coUuze1CmROep+MQ9/kMbuEhvIV1hCD5oFG+dgaOyOhZ7vzkLsBDqb8zLx3p+1w0Hdxk2MI3k4hRbToaetY2fKY2djHCadUG1ebQ9aMIl6E36homPa0jchD2ZIcRlbn1/3P/lLQF6XIXgMW7lmt9p9lvBUXj5VUM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b=QKpukNVB; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b="QKpukNVB" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= sang-engineering.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=k1; bh=Xtb/ sLzI5bW8Bo35Swpy28juwuCbw+RUPfTq/h5670o=; b=QKpukNVB4TrB18ESciEG Y1BK6GL0+tBbE8uORRbGDneKzuh9uGhhKCB2cmtcYXdo9P8URsWJMc5kroXb5xku /95y7vKfD28hQkEtqoBh/Zd8sfLN8TbO2uVxbmYomKwcV5SqVdjtrGW+bzktOtCd X2QgSDBGKTdKZmcgdCEVmYHwW9khCrPWKve/iYDCm3d11lxgiaSDM7lcQe5Hsdg1 oiGLbyAZy7qpRc1RpDEaYDh0/xK5QulJ5wYVr5YmkO5CzI5Zb5Wjs7E3xQgR7Iie yCeMLOrK7Hb+7wUOPLXU0oljL5YpenVUYrdkagHlXWpXIsb13TIDN0e4qSgeR2Tp LQ== Received: (qmail 578202 invoked from network); 10 Sep 2025 13:17:49 +0200 Received: by mail.zeus03.de with UTF8SMTPSA (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted, authenticated); 10 Sep 2025 13:17:49 +0200 X-UD-Smtp-Session: l3s3148p1@ieomknA+gpwujnuV Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 13:17:49 +0200 From: Wolfram Sang To: "Herve Codina (Schneider Electric)" Cc: Hoan Tran , Linus Walleij , Bartosz Golaszewski , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Geert Uytterhoeven , Magnus Damm , Saravana Kannan , Serge Semin , Phil Edworthy , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, Pascal Eberhard , Miquel Raynal , Thomas Petazzoni Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] ARM: dts: r9a06g032: Add GPIO controllers Message-ID: References: <20250909120041.154459-1-herve.codina@bootlin.com> <20250909120041.154459-2-herve.codina@bootlin.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="iumSSLlPufN+jsYR" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250909120041.154459-2-herve.codina@bootlin.com> --iumSSLlPufN+jsYR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Sep 09, 2025 at 02:00:32PM +0200, Herve Codina (Schneider Electric)= wrote: > Add GPIO controllers (Synosys DesignWare IPs) available in the > r9a06g032 (RZ/N1D) SoC. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Herve Codina (Schneider Electric) Of course, I couldn't test and review all GPIOs but the GPIOs I tested on my N1D-DB and EB work nicely so far. Previous tests didn't work because I simply missed to setup a configuration switch properly for this case. Phew! Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang Tested-by: Wolfram Sang I won't have the bandwidth to review the irq patches. Maybe I can donate tests, but no promises... --iumSSLlPufN+jsYR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAmjBXlkACgkQFA3kzBSg KbbEaA//fbbtj5vTazGI3o6nzrkselioCZlzKsf5vGNmi8jqg+aXHRK7vm7yTfSW i0A3/MxjuXHIaEDf/MW8SgPp6/z+TtyMohi3cnwPPonAbOKaICpEEbQmrEXTO4kn AQE3VM1lXAxGjL/rHi7tv+d2o3s3SM9fHGNvmsTaYHsLxJni/ylOERHKSCDNZvdT spoyw+5i7xw5rmN5Drjh+LWT04H3YwPMs9Hikbk6fdd2eTZ9yEWi2wLiNwbSLX9z iSNkE6TTth9OvGGQusfuzgwJVq9oAMFNcW1YWISCznGHJ1hOaHhvi2+mTStfNgtR h9mgNiOF3NuPm6OMqtNSQYYkJ3Y/LEYy3O3RAhRCVk3B1Gdt/nkKMuigVSvV7m1Q 3xFNMiDqCuzdX15JPAgu927pSNnQXP0GKshTtZTpCtzFjj/GgEl8KJCjqQ7og0bx FatOjTUnFv1BZXc/LaVPthp1FSozfje7RULinOrXSq+nVUZJJrNcHYflR9qKx51q 5Q5iC7TX8qmyewAgqwnMJMNNMgwt3ykWfxeVte8P2CgBJdPfaRIqYxEC+8KQHBF6 WeAin+KN5RWDAAceH6NZuJKlQzO1QucH/ciAxwO6naSa3DBgasISrvOU9s0dZCvt jkeXbOIhevD6w2y6CsApyTG7UX9ckayXAec1htNOJOL15VpGToc= =Mu3J -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --iumSSLlPufN+jsYR--