From: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@kernel.org>
To: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 4/6] dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add compatibility for TEE support
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 14:44:49 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aMkqifHSdlCs4VjA@sumit-X1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250625094028.758016-5-arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>
Hi Arnaud,
First of all apologies for such a late review comment as previously I
wasn't CCed or involved in the review of this patch-set. In case any of
my following comments have been discussed in the past then feel free to
point me at relevant discussions.
On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 11:40:26AM +0200, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote:
> The "st,stm32mp1-m4-tee" compatible is utilized in a system configuration
> where the Cortex-M4 firmware is loaded by the Trusted Execution Environment
> (TEE).
Having a DT based compatible for a TEE service to me just feels like it
is redundant here. I can see you have also used a TEE bus based device
too but that is not being properly used. I know subsystems like
remoteproc, SCMI and others heavily rely on DT to hardcode properties of
system firmware which are rather better to be discovered dynamically.
So I have an open question for you and the remoteproc subsystem
maintainers being:
Is it feasible to rather leverage the benefits of a fully discoverable
TEE bus rather than relying on platform bus/ DT to hardcode firmware
properties?
>
> For instance, this compatible is used in both the Linux and OP-TEE device
> trees:
> - In OP-TEE, a node is defined in the device tree with the
> "st,stm32mp1-m4-tee" compatible to support signed remoteproc firmware.
> Based on DT properties, the OP-TEE remoteproc framework is initiated to
> expose a trusted application service to authenticate and load the remote
> processor firmware provided by the Linux remoteproc framework, as well
> as to start and stop the remote processor.
> - In Linux, when the compatibility is set, the Cortex-M resets should not
> be declared in the device tree. In such a configuration, the reset is
> managed by the OP-TEE remoteproc driver and is no longer accessible from
> the Linux kernel.
>
> Associated with this new compatible, add the "st,proc-id" property to
> identify the remote processor. This ID is used to define a unique ID,
> common between Linux, U-Boot, and OP-TEE, to identify a coprocessor.
This "st,proc-id" is just one such property which can rather be directly
probed from the TEE/OP-TEE service rather than hardcoding it in DT here.
I think the same will apply to other properties as well.
-Sumit
> This ID will be used in requests to the OP-TEE remoteproc Trusted
> Application to specify the remote processor.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>
> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
> ---
> .../bindings/remoteproc/st,stm32-rproc.yaml | 58 ++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/st,stm32-rproc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/st,stm32-rproc.yaml
> index 843679c557e7..58da07e536fc 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/st,stm32-rproc.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/st,stm32-rproc.yaml
> @@ -16,7 +16,12 @@ maintainers:
>
> properties:
> compatible:
> - const: st,stm32mp1-m4
> + enum:
> + - st,stm32mp1-m4
> + - st,stm32mp1-m4-tee
> + description:
> + Use "st,stm32mp1-m4" for the Cortex-M4 coprocessor management by non-secure context
> + Use "st,stm32mp1-m4-tee" for the Cortex-M4 coprocessor management by secure context
>
> reg:
> description:
> @@ -43,6 +48,10 @@ properties:
> - description: The offset of the hold boot setting register
> - description: The field mask of the hold boot
>
> + st,proc-id:
> + description: remote processor identifier
> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> +
> st,syscfg-tz:
> deprecated: true
> description:
> @@ -146,21 +155,43 @@ properties:
> required:
> - compatible
> - reg
> - - resets
>
> allOf:
> - if:
> properties:
> - reset-names:
> - not:
> - contains:
> - const: hold_boot
> + compatible:
> + contains:
> + const: st,stm32mp1-m4
> then:
> + if:
> + properties:
> + reset-names:
> + not:
> + contains:
> + const: hold_boot
> + then:
> + required:
> + - st,syscfg-holdboot
> + else:
> + properties:
> + st,syscfg-holdboot: false
> + required:
> + - reset-names
> required:
> - - st,syscfg-holdboot
> - else:
> + - resets
> +
> + - if:
> + properties:
> + compatible:
> + contains:
> + const: st,stm32mp1-m4-tee
> + then:
> properties:
> st,syscfg-holdboot: false
> + reset-names: false
> + resets: false
> + required:
> + - st,proc-id
>
> additionalProperties: false
>
> @@ -192,5 +223,16 @@ examples:
> st,syscfg-rsc-tbl = <&tamp 0x144 0xFFFFFFFF>;
> st,syscfg-m4-state = <&tamp 0x148 0xFFFFFFFF>;
> };
> + - |
> + #include <dt-bindings/reset/stm32mp1-resets.h>
> + m4@10000000 {
> + compatible = "st,stm32mp1-m4-tee";
> + reg = <0x10000000 0x40000>,
> + <0x30000000 0x40000>,
> + <0x38000000 0x10000>;
> + st,proc-id = <0>;
> + st,syscfg-rsc-tbl = <&tamp 0x144 0xFFFFFFFF>;
> + st,syscfg-m4-state = <&tamp 0x148 0xFFFFFFFF>;
> + };
>
> ...
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-16 9:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-25 9:40 [PATCH v19 0/6] Introduction of a remoteproc tee to load signed firmware Arnaud Pouliquen
2025-06-25 9:40 ` [PATCH v19 1/6] remoteproc: core: Introduce rproc_pa_to_va helper Arnaud Pouliquen
2025-06-25 9:40 ` [PATCH v19 2/6] remoteproc: Add TEE support Arnaud Pouliquen
2025-07-31 10:25 ` Harshal Dev
2025-08-01 7:23 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2025-08-04 9:26 ` Harshal Dev
2025-08-11 14:11 ` Sumit Garg
2025-08-14 10:47 ` Harshal Dev
2025-08-18 5:07 ` Sumit Garg
2025-08-13 16:42 ` Abdellatif El Khlifi
2025-08-14 7:17 ` Sumit Garg
2025-06-25 9:40 ` [PATCH v19 3/6] remoteproc: Introduce optional release_fw operation Arnaud Pouliquen
2025-06-25 9:40 ` [PATCH v19 4/6] dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add compatibility for TEE support Arnaud Pouliquen
2025-09-16 9:14 ` Sumit Garg [this message]
2025-09-16 13:26 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2025-09-17 10:08 ` Sumit Garg
2025-09-17 13:47 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2025-09-19 6:46 ` Sumit Garg
2025-09-22 8:57 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2025-10-07 13:50 ` [Linux-stm32] " Arnaud POULIQUEN
2025-10-08 16:38 ` Mathieu Poirier
2025-10-10 5:58 ` Sumit Garg
2025-10-10 5:44 ` Sumit Garg
2025-10-10 10:04 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2025-10-11 22:49 ` Sumit Garg
2025-10-13 9:46 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2025-06-25 9:40 ` [PATCH v19 5/6] remoteproc: stm32: Create sub-functions to request shutdown and release Arnaud Pouliquen
2025-06-25 9:40 ` [PATCH v19 6/6] remoteproc: stm32: Add support of an OP-TEE TA to load the firmware Arnaud Pouliquen
2025-09-12 16:03 ` [PATCH v19 0/6] Introduction of a remoteproc tee to load signed firmware Arnaud POULIQUEN
2025-09-15 16:44 ` Mathieu Poirier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aMkqifHSdlCs4VjA@sumit-X1 \
--to=sumit.garg@kernel.org \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jens.wiklander@linaro.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).