From: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
To: Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>,
Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>,
Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>, Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
"Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@igalia.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: kernel@pengutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Liam Girdwood" <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
"Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
"Zhang Rui" <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
"Lukasz Luba" <lukasz.luba@arm.com>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, "Søren Andersen" <san@skov.dk>,
"Guenter Roeck" <groeck@chromium.org>,
"Matti Vaittinen" <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>,
"Ahmad Fatoum" <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RFC: Selecting an NVMEM cell for Power State Change Reason (PSCR) recording
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2025 14:00:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aN5pSWBFRZlNRv3U@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250618120255.3141862-1-o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Hi all,
I'm seeking consensus on a minimal, upstream-acceptable way to identify the
single NVMEM cell used to persist a Power State Change Reason (PSCR). Typical
targets are battery-backed RTC scratchpads or small EEPROM. The aim is to have
a tiny breadcrumb available before userspace, across full power cuts, and
shared by bootloader/kernel/userspace.
DT vs Userspace vs ACPI
* DeviceTree (preferred): Describing where the storage lives under a real
NVMEM provider (RTC/EEPROM) is early, robust, and OS-agnostic.
* Userspace (fallback): Possible via module/cmdline/sysfs, but leaves an
early-boot window unconfigured and reduces usefulness for embedded devices.
* ACPI: No existing shared mechanism for this use case at present (not
proposing an ACPI path right now).
What implementations were tried
* A PSCR consumer node in DT -> NACKed as not a HW node.
* Kernel/module parameters or sysfs selection -> tried earlier, but rejected
for new designs and cannot guarantee early availability.
* Name-based lookups in NVMEM -> considered fragile and not scalable.
Other options which came in question (seeking guidance)
* cell-level `compatible` on a fixed-cell child (analogous to `mac-base`) to
nominate the PSCR cell under the existing NVMEM provider. DT remains purely
descriptive (location/size); encoding is documented outside DT and shared
across components.
* `/chosen` phandle pointing to the nominated fixed-cell (simple to discover;
unsure about policy concerns).
* pstore integration (not tried): a backend that uses a nominated NVMEM cell if
such a nomination is acceptable.
* nvmem-layout usage (not tried): provider-side markup of the region to
indicate it carries PSCR, if that pattern is acceptable for this purpose.
* Open to any established precedent for nominating a specific NVMEM cell for a
system role without introducing software/virtual DT nodes.
Ask
* Is a cell-level `compatible` on a `fixed-cell` child an acceptable way to
nominate the PSCR cell?
* If not, is a `/chosen` phandle acceptable here, or is there a preferred
alternative?
Thanks for guidance - once the selection mechanism is agreed, I can respin the
PSCR series accordingly.
Latest patch version: https://lore.kernel.org/all/aHTZTFxfS6Bn4yhz@pengutronix.de/
Best Regards,
Oleksij
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
next parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-02 12:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20250618120255.3141862-1-o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
2025-10-02 12:00 ` Oleksij Rempel [this message]
2025-10-02 16:07 ` RFC: Selecting an NVMEM cell for Power State Change Reason (PSCR) recording Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aN5pSWBFRZlNRv3U@pengutronix.de \
--to=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bleung@chromium.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gpiccoli@igalia.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=groeck@chromium.org \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
--cc=mazziesaccount@gmail.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=san@skov.dk \
--cc=sre@kernel.org \
--cc=srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=tzungbi@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).