From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.zeus03.de (zeus03.de [194.117.254.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 140848F6F for ; Fri, 26 Sep 2025 06:47:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758869257; cv=none; b=n3VKajP7/k0lefPuHTyMvBgmFHz+3cfZ5TrTspvscol1P5s1Rnr5rXuyUWGapuqjnCLffSY7Rzdm7t9T9G+oCqybWGlFcaK2eVmTP/1OUOEweGCjzhMVkEI3yY+/y7CzUzEIb9U0NtVb1wGs2pWkic6ppS27810sbuu/A16A/5Q= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758869257; c=relaxed/simple; bh=COunz1JLa1fpmV1AAJupyIS7fAiGMYlnjvCJNA2KWK8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=deLU5RHRnfISpbOGWQlgR11BuEUOzj6hRTOj08C4gN14w3ZM3drhwNndxf2iaHfK1L7+FCwHkNpQqrtYvNJ5Z65gvlnmGRl/Fc7KDMwvW2V2mZE14eqIE1BHr5C8hQk4wQ23OpRgvO1/hA1rN36NdQUk+S7emPoKWC/EiCkj17w= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b=FnIwbFiB; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b="FnIwbFiB" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= sang-engineering.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=k1; bh=Zg5B R8TR0pwXhS1HMnn+PMtDRUEhr+0FbUE0xjhN2ok=; b=FnIwbFiBtLNXA4GM3Xad /H/dtDIRdZ4Itp/C6UXVxubIduzYAwiR5lmtuy6oZ9KHV78q6c8RG9tmbPfE6ozV LF/FgZfyaggUZ5wW2k0VpvH+M16zCuIYNm7VpIPLbcAfrNXG/0RiHbs0ySJrc9NJ SEhoW8LymZ6tz2eascEXDe5AkLf2+qFYCUmsxXu2sy5/k51pDFOjG5AG/prsd9gB NxFIVdZV8fLev9AN2FWjBd9sI/XwcKoy0XunztJg/nrKKFQ7tGySZhNcPB3HuzDp mqZMVY8VtUSKDbQRBiEiDw0Wd6ozEyjHNK76d637RDORBsgmChaARi9RmmaDV4pZ tA== Received: (qmail 2152516 invoked from network); 26 Sep 2025 08:47:31 +0200 Received: by mail.zeus03.de with UTF8SMTPSA (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted, authenticated); 26 Sep 2025 08:47:31 +0200 X-UD-Smtp-Session: l3s3148p1@+BPqqK4/0IUgAwDPXwQHAL/S9V79e5yL Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2025 08:47:30 +0200 From: Wolfram Sang To: Jonas Jelonek Cc: Chris Packham , Andi Shyti , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Conor Dooley , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Markus Stockhausen , Sven Eckelmann , Harshal Gohel Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 04/12] i2c: rtl9300: use regmap fields and API for registers Message-ID: References: <20250831100457.3114-1-jelonek.jonas@gmail.com> <20250831100457.3114-5-jelonek.jonas@gmail.com> <476cd546-1bde-4ff0-a785-2e6fa21b79d4@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="htY2TmuyroWQDCdS" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <476cd546-1bde-4ff0-a785-2e6fa21b79d4@gmail.com> --htY2TmuyroWQDCdS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Jonas, > I just noticed that it seems like an already applied patch got lost [1]. > This was supposed to be merged to Andi's i2c/i2c-host [2] and actually was > there until the first three patches of this series got merged. >=20 > Since I had already issue a few days ago trying to rebase the remaining > patches, this might be the cause it also fails for you? True. This patch somehow got lost and doesn't apply cleanly anymore because of patch 3 of this series. Are open to resend this series, rebased and with the lost patch added? Thanks for the pointer, Wolfram --htY2TmuyroWQDCdS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAmjWNwIACgkQFA3kzBSg KbalGA/5AZzQHP/5+gcHsGeveIpB6If9w0fi5dYGUCglTAVLQpRx2xnBp4dOrnbZ ZF8OeEPy0VkhY0c0vuMtyEvkLAPt7xT6h4Ed9yZGcNn32axeJQ8Q5m2LAyA8meyl rV0NZeGGQ4r3/iRmdsE69Iab4iprmS3gZRDPyv6PkIDsTQK0X+RlCs7wwk6CWXxN 12wLxEE0VROVXkAj9rQMAdwJFDlo9wnz9Wi20FwrXaSnxhua5dHWIgKXoW8Kj3Mo KL0JAn6QE3cNAN2u9Y7bBpH2z2kfaJNgmWz0zYsCnA5sItmven9OiBVfKdgRCGXv zTKSQyMQmlI5cMU72uYGRwCVKsMH4IETKyZWZBBn4+we8a+kHGB6SLicCmE8vhlW +XGt/oSE6TCLZ52IUwAcshWgF3EqepLcVvypjm3/eGycRM7+Lb3NKJQheJIBXJrB 2VstLTcEl1r3/PQnBM6P4iJ0Gdit92L1PhQ8HNoYR4zBjQA+U1HQfO94r+Cri+ZQ ahh8fB+mNM+00PIBCNIxs0tD66STvQBXM09tpJUv9BJv3R9YYnvb4SQjb4Q0QU3A /ux0kn5vopQdxlvN6gTGovlE5Is/e7d2/y1yxdPZntk3qBc8UGfym4CheeWgJh/6 dgSWs/wlnFyrktdUOwvcwDXh6wTC6YZScRLtRCGD5H+OiIWfWhs= =c2bU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --htY2TmuyroWQDCdS--