From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.zeus03.de (zeus03.de [194.117.254.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE8B7199FBA for ; Mon, 6 Oct 2025 06:30:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1759732226; cv=none; b=BlVTWEpXFQSFGXPr8adBMDJSOdLe/NPkKBcjNAwyWb9LP4lSDuyQZtCds0Du022x8bJHz+p1ovI9Nnrr0cB+i3yYm2902GoC7Isb5bmf064Lux5ywQYIIz47BjvSCPcInKMuYQn2Xw/voQxq/0iLW63Fidvl08WsmVFcj3xuAGs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1759732226; c=relaxed/simple; bh=x2N4Gl06CRVkAUIQae7XR5NTyc8ajnPU1fzsc4jb6Jw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=OVW2g8lHZE2c4gdvIGmkwh8T5NaZN5jvgJaXJ8343x+q/GbaF1dg/ikQ7LuftSHjP5iPUxeSBV5Z+zG7qXYxiORRRjrj3nPQnejsC2B88oYdmKtpAy2dq4piOBmIowEGOB4PekaFp8hht4UHvgmPOfPZTGfuUj4VoyxOaYxspIU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b=gPvkV56U; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b="gPvkV56U" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= sang-engineering.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=k1; bh=Ermd zmJAlkt7RTxIorw+WZF/JeZoJHW+2asQokLhcQs=; b=gPvkV56UUwlRRuFqCXTr fqkYwzInVRK/WfpxuBfNYjrATPUBn/MwfZ8icy9gocVGvmAbMV5sgIBC7eXnm4L+ cuU8ZF/R1GMx+66fDEVAvwvbVAKVJejXnK2no/WD/UHlOPB0szd0p3GMJ6Ho6QNd IW6LznhTlpDA/Zui8kgoY4jiijMf3TEQuFcBb8wnPpcJdB6+7TZ9ZT10ZK/e2VxF XROWS3TDybEos7WezgA2z98zoEhGodYGDvurh8bKx+0dEAvaq90V9P5jEu56UtQ1 R4tdmFDHTtV/njKfatr7GpwIO7+PuzVB5GDWuyQBy/rwmGzgkJ597kqEex1RZWls xg== Received: (qmail 1651313 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2025 08:30:11 +0200 Received: by mail.zeus03.de with UTF8SMTPSA (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted, authenticated); 6 Oct 2025 08:30:11 +0200 X-UD-Smtp-Session: l3s3148p1@DkJblXdAqp0gAwDPXwQHAL/S9V79e5yL Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2025 08:30:11 +0200 From: wsa+renesas To: Biju Das Cc: "linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org" , Guenter Roeck , Prabhakar Mahadev Lad , Wim Van Sebroeck , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Geert Uytterhoeven , "magnus.damm" , "linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] dt-bindings: watchdog: factor out RZ/V2H(P) watchdog Message-ID: References: <20251005144416.3699-6-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> <20251005144416.3699-10-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="207WNXhuwDD0X5yY" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: --207WNXhuwDD0X5yY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Biju, > > > > + - enum: > > > > + - renesas,r9a09g057-wdt # RZ/V2H(P) > > > > + - renesas,r9a09g077-wdt # RZ/T2H > > > > + > > > > + - items: > > > > + - const: renesas,r9a09g087-wdt # RZ/N2H > > > > + - const: renesas,r9a09g077-wdt # RZ/T2H >=20 > I guess a comment like # fallback RZ/T2H here will avoid confusion. Hmmm, if we add such a comment for every fallback, this will be quite some churn, I would think. My favourite solution would be to swap the 'items' entry with the 'enum'. So, everything with a fallback comes first, and the 'plain' entries last. But what do others think? Happy hacking, Wolfram --207WNXhuwDD0X5yY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAmjjYe4ACgkQFA3kzBSg KbbOFRAAgYqPGrN3u/3Fx50PlzcwzNKImy/8KWT6UvMCdWsvfhDK1AwRNCTH34F/ +2jEn5LDB7qfHP+Apa7d9bKPrX1BQoNM5UwmEI4WCEt7UJbZtTcx66ekqLb8jz3T BRJSE3wsk4SX9Bd98dpQ3X8qHHYli1a2LhDv408MfchYzVJ/HcEAdneXqqUaVuwN ZXT+rcipc3DWYTNlquil+Z0jlbwtLG6QXcuRiVP03y/B5/QeMbbozPILj2ybXP5x YRAnFLJmLeW1+wfIb5OjbydzDif9UD8KpDcP5/NLECGuLDbvoXQVCAaXEX/PHEeF 4WV+xhTDR7e09CmWKYUPsp7i+M40obXm7KRb3UHlPucvkXxz/ZYvJecpYb9HoKXy 9J3NeSc0zCwmnita51dQxrBQwxSakSYd+J7K4GThkz+iE0GtX64sYtb9orqxO8+L jPjCCUqier/CR5Mt4aRKHfUWtQ65kVI6h0XjGN+XYMooIIDKcXBf+oZD4EK74nhP XUSfVEpP8oJgO6EpiZDwRhW/gKadZ5I9JZCdJxMI5dxIs3ECBA1mBiYmnnhIASMe Yq3qFzXln3BUznAR4xZ5jwtaNIQQoYmESuIE9QhkYgg3T8mqOMlkG6fvt3aLqeU5 W0935mJenwcr4I1gVoAFZvEmzI42UzChBKCCV2OL54768Y3Jld8= =W/0L -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --207WNXhuwDD0X5yY--