From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-m16.yeah.net (mail-m16.yeah.net [1.95.21.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45C592E8E0E for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2025 09:09:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=1.95.21.14 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761642601; cv=none; b=cngr66NnST/kDEZVrQUPQsCYheFUIwPdbOyzXzZAmYYgXb2aYGfehYJPqi3eTIjil/YvnizpcBygo/QwOWtOFUAYHErl0FMgMBH49baLcjaW1RNwk1qAInab/G6Jd4g84G0dv7MuFzuSNpJZkiYM0WkK8OJgptQF27tOFryE2Js= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761642601; c=relaxed/simple; bh=zUGY+xPee4aWhCbNw7W10rqEHgwsqSjRvspTfW/+QYg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ptTfvYKue4m2m/8+GHze9KCg1CaYd6ZEfnmnbW7f34KwLqnEydr9XnRRnOkgi1n32FTYlDFXmpoIj6G/5n1ruf1A4SvV/rYkhYTXFUZxCeOE/2HDBQ5Q5c/u6B2t3pO2BgfDfN1kzlIMKd6gaqW1KNJnDxRuGTfrT/eBx0JH0FQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=yeah.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=yeah.net; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=yeah.net header.i=@yeah.net header.b=mJLRAgOB; arc=none smtp.client-ip=1.95.21.14 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=yeah.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=yeah.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=yeah.net header.i=@yeah.net header.b="mJLRAgOB" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yeah.net; s=s110527; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type; bh=WaTABlPQzql62JP4bYpGFB1GN/KGFtKB/QnUa6OyJ+E=; b=mJLRAgOBFmbF4UXSo3Qm6FPpTQs8JJU8wIFm7iGmahKNMDfFafS2NaRysmcHWa c8NiIPAv/k9sNdIJDaFtj+1k5XDbw7Mg3OFeFAbOQz4s3DxWQpNYZoMj8xZl3jCt 7WImln7p/K3KCn4IAmqZQKXCN+G1FpLsBEc+lhPdVs0Lc= Received: from dragon (unknown []) by gzsmtp2 (Coremail) with SMTP id Ms8vCgDXf10BiABp90vTAA--.48036S3; Tue, 28 Oct 2025 17:08:20 +0800 (CST) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2025 17:08:17 +0800 From: Shawn Guo To: Rain Yang Cc: airlied@gmail.com, boris.brezillon@collabora.com, conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, festevam@gmail.com, imx@lists.linux.dev, kernel@pengutronix.de, krzk+dt@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, liviu.dudau@arm.com, maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, marek.vasut@mailbox.org, mripard@kernel.org, p.zabel@pengutronix.de, robh@kernel.org, s.hauer@pengutronix.de, shawnguo@kernel.org, simona@ffwll.ch, sre@kernel.org, steven.price@arm.com, tzimmermann@suse.de, xianzhong.li@nxp.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] arm64: dts: imx95: Describe Mali G310 GPU Message-ID: References: <20250925203938.169880-1-marek.vasut@mailbox.org> <20250925203938.169880-2-marek.vasut@mailbox.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CM-TRANSID:Ms8vCgDXf10BiABp90vTAA--.48036S3 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1Uf129KBjvdXoWrtrWrAFyUKr1kGw4UJw1xGrg_yoWkAFb_uF 4UCrs7Aw42gryUtFZ3CF4q9ryvkw15Jry3uw15JFnrZ34DAa48Ca9IkrWxZa4rCrWDArn8 tF98XryYkr4IvjkaLaAFLSUrUUUUjb8apTn2vfkv8UJUUUU8Yxn0WfASr-VFAUDa7-sFnT 9fnUUvcSsGvfC2KfnxnUUI43ZEXa7IU1qQ6JUUUUU== X-CM-SenderInfo: pvkd40hjxrjqh1hdxhhqhw/1tbiNwV94mkAiAXl5gAA3K On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 04:21:05PM +0800, Rain Yang wrote: > On Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at 08:57:08AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > >On Sat, Oct 11, 2025 at 12:53:29PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > >> On 9/25/25 10:38 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: > >> > The instance of the GPU populated in i.MX95 is the G310, describe this > >> > GPU in the DT. Include dummy GPU voltage regulator and OPP tables. > >> Is there still anything that should be changed with this patchset, or can it > >> be applied ? > > > >I'm waiting binding change to be applied first. Or is it already done? > > > >Shawn > > > Hi Shawn, > It might be better for Marek to remove the always-on GPUAPB clock from the DTS, given that > it's an SCMI protocol clock and the kernel expects it to be available during operations. > > Also, the gpu_fix_reg appears unnecessary for the driver and could be removed[1]. > > [1] https://cgit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-misc/commit/?id=a8cb5ca53690aa809f4f65e14192753073e61a71, > https://cgit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-misc/commit/?id=02df3543f3e0ea572e2c739605ebd6c20e1149c4 Ah, sorry! I did not know we haven't reached agreement on the change. Shawn