From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>, Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@nxp.com>,
Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>,
Emanuele Ghidoli <ghidoliemanuele@gmail.com>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"imx@lists.linux.dev" <imx@lists.linux.dev>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Daniel Scally <dan.scally@ideasonboard.com>,
Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>,
Stefan Klug <stefan.klug@ideasonboard.com>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: imx8mp-debix-model-a: Disable EEE for 1000T
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2025 17:11:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aSNAP9G4cwRKvxng@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251123152356.GF15447@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>
On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 12:23:56AM +0900, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2025 at 08:52:00AM +0000, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 23, 2025 at 02:38:02PM +0900, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > On Sat, Nov 22, 2025 at 09:57:49AM +0000, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Nov 22, 2025 at 04:22:46PM +0900, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > > > Hello Wei,
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 01:50:55AM +0000, Wei Fang wrote:
> > > > > > Sorry, I only have a little experience with DWMac, add Clark to help look
> > > > > > at this issue.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thank you.
> > > > >
> > > > > I think we're getting close to having a good understanding of the
> > > > > problem. I've debugged it as far as I could based on the information
> > > > > available publicly. Let's try to get to the bottom of this issue, it
> > > > > impacts quite a lot of people and it would be very nice to fix it
> > > > > properly in mainline.
> > > > >
> > > > > The short summary is that I'm experiencing an interrupt storm on IRQ 135
> > > > > when EEE is enabled with the EQOS interface.
> > > > >
> > > > > My current theory is that
> > > > >
> > > > > - The lpi_intr_o signal of the EQOS is OR'ed into IRQ 135.
> > > > > - The issue is triggerted by the PHY exiting LPI mode
> > > > > - When it exits LPI mode, the PHY restarts generating the RX clock
> > > > > (clk_rx_i).
> > > > > - The MAC detects exit from LPI, and asserts lpi_intr_o.
> > > > > - Before the CPU has time to process the interrupt, the PHY enters LPI
> > > > > mode again, and stops generating the RX clock.
> > > > > - The CPU processes the interrupt and reads the GMAC4_LPI_CTRL_STATUS
> > > > > registers. This does not clear lpi_intr_o as there's no clk_rx_i.
> > > >
> > > > Please try setting STMMAC_FLAG_RX_CLK_RUNS_IN_LPI in dwmac-imx.c and
> > > > see whether that changes the behaviour.
> > >
> > > I have tested that and it worked like a charm ! I have submitted
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251123053518.8478-1-laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com
> > >
> > > That was quite an adventure. Thank you so much for all your support, I'm
> > > not sure I would have managed without you (or at least I would have
> > > needed way more time). I really really appreciate it.
> > >
> > > If the above patch gets accepted, we will probably be able to remove the
> > > eee-broken-* properties from the i.MX8MP device tree files (and possibly
> > > from i.MX8DXL and i.MX93 as well). I have mentioned that below the
> > > commit message of the patch, with a test procedure as it should be
> > > tested on each board.
> >
> > As stated in reply to that patch, while this may reduce the severity of
> > the storm, I don't think it'll completely eliminate it.
> >
> > I made the suggestion to set the flag as a test to confirm whether the
> > lpi_intr_o is indeed the problem by ensuring that the receive domain is
> > always clocked, and thus ensuring that the signal clears within four
> > clock cycles, rather than an indefinite period should the remote end
> > re-enter LPI mode quicky.
>
> You're right. I've checked replied to the patch with the following
> numbers.
>
> 100TX link, eee-broken-* set: 7000 interrupts
> 1000T link, eee-broken-* set: 2711 interrupts
> 100TX link, eee-broken-* unset: 9450 interrupts
> 1000T link, eee-broken-* unset: 6066 interrupts
Sadly, I think this means for iMX8MP, the correct answer is to disable
EEE completely. What I was thinking when I brought this up is as follows
and dwmac-imx.c can set STMMAC_FLAG_EEE_DISABLE for iMX8MP to prevent
the use of EEE.
This works because, in phylink, pl->mac_supports_eee_ops will be set
since stmmac implements the two LPI operations. pl->mac_supports_eee
will be clear because pl->config->lpi_capabilities will be zero, and
pl->config->lpi_interfaces will be empty. This causes phylink to call
phy_disable_eee() on all PHYs that end up being attached to this
phylink instance, which should result in the PHY EEE advertisement
being cleared.
I'll package this up into a proper patch tomorrow.
drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c | 7 ++++++-
include/linux/stmmac.h | 9 +++++----
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
index 1d37c2b5ad46..113cae2bc593 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
@@ -1376,7 +1376,12 @@ static int stmmac_phylink_setup(struct stmmac_priv *priv)
config->supported_interfaces,
pcs->supported_interfaces);
- if (priv->dma_cap.eee) {
+ /* Some platforms, e.g. iMX8MP, wire lpi_intr_o to the same interrupt
+ * used for stmmac's main interrupts, which leads to interrupt storms.
+ * STMMAC_FLAG_EEE_DISABLE allows EEE to be disabled on such platforms.
+ */
+ if (priv->dma_cap.eee &&
+ !(priv->plat->flags & STMMAC_FLAG_EEE_DISABLE)) {
/* Assume all supported interfaces also support LPI */
memcpy(config->lpi_interfaces, config->supported_interfaces,
sizeof(config->lpi_interfaces));
diff --git a/include/linux/stmmac.h b/include/linux/stmmac.h
index 8ae068706b63..4c770262a2f8 100644
--- a/include/linux/stmmac.h
+++ b/include/linux/stmmac.h
@@ -187,10 +187,11 @@ enum dwmac_core_type {
#define STMMAC_FLAG_MULTI_MSI_EN BIT(7)
#define STMMAC_FLAG_EXT_SNAPSHOT_EN BIT(8)
#define STMMAC_FLAG_INT_SNAPSHOT_EN BIT(9)
-#define STMMAC_FLAG_RX_CLK_RUNS_IN_LPI BIT(10)
-#define STMMAC_FLAG_EN_TX_LPI_CLOCKGATING BIT(11)
-#define STMMAC_FLAG_EN_TX_LPI_CLK_PHY_CAP BIT(12)
-#define STMMAC_FLAG_HWTSTAMP_CORRECT_LATENCY BIT(13)
+#define STMMAC_FLAG_EEE_DISABLE BIT(10)
+#define STMMAC_FLAG_RX_CLK_RUNS_IN_LPI BIT(11)
+#define STMMAC_FLAG_EN_TX_LPI_CLOCKGATING BIT(12)
+#define STMMAC_FLAG_EN_TX_LPI_CLK_PHY_CAP BIT(13)
+#define STMMAC_FLAG_HWTSTAMP_CORRECT_LATENCY BIT(14)
struct mac_device_info;
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-23 17:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-26 12:29 [PATCH] arm64: dts: imx8mp-debix-model-a: Disable EEE for 1000T Laurent Pinchart
2025-10-27 1:31 ` Fabio Estevam
2025-10-27 3:08 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-10-27 7:27 ` Laurent Pinchart
2025-10-27 8:47 ` Emanuele Ghidoli
2025-10-27 9:00 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-10-27 9:18 ` Emanuele Ghidoli
2025-10-27 9:32 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-10-27 23:08 ` Laurent Pinchart
2025-10-27 11:22 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-10-27 23:15 ` Laurent Pinchart
2025-10-27 9:12 ` Oleksij Rempel
2025-10-27 10:02 ` Laurent Pinchart
2025-10-27 10:23 ` Oleksij Rempel
2025-10-27 10:31 ` Laurent Pinchart
2025-10-27 10:34 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-10-27 10:44 ` Oleksij Rempel
2025-10-27 10:48 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-10-27 12:50 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-10-27 14:50 ` Oleksij Rempel
2025-11-12 12:34 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-11-12 12:41 ` Kieran Bingham
2025-11-12 12:56 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-11-13 1:17 ` Laurent Pinchart
2025-11-12 21:32 ` Laurent Pinchart
2025-10-27 9:07 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-10-27 9:33 ` Laurent Pinchart
2025-10-27 9:45 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-10-27 9:55 ` Laurent Pinchart
2025-10-27 13:33 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-10-27 15:13 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-10-27 19:52 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-10-27 23:46 ` Laurent Pinchart
2025-10-28 0:57 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-10-28 7:18 ` Laurent Pinchart
2025-11-11 23:54 ` Laurent Pinchart
2025-11-12 12:03 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-11-12 22:25 ` Laurent Pinchart
2025-11-13 1:06 ` Laurent Pinchart
2025-11-13 10:59 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-11-14 22:26 ` Laurent Pinchart
2025-11-18 1:50 ` Wei Fang
2025-11-22 7:22 ` Laurent Pinchart
2025-11-22 9:57 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-11-23 5:38 ` Laurent Pinchart
2025-11-23 8:52 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-11-23 15:23 ` Laurent Pinchart
2025-11-23 17:11 ` Russell King (Oracle) [this message]
2025-11-24 0:12 ` Laurent Pinchart
2025-11-24 5:44 ` Oleksij Rempel
2025-11-24 8:43 ` Russell King (Oracle)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aSNAP9G4cwRKvxng@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=dan.scally@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=ghidoliemanuele@gmail.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=stefan.klug@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=wei.fang@nxp.com \
--cc=xiaoning.wang@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).