From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail97.out.titan.email (mail97.out.titan.email [3.219.11.208]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC0A6155C82 for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2025 09:31:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=3.219.11.208 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765877505; cv=none; b=cRKuD9oKlHGnNzhyXw/FACIX4Rtc90L+c4QEJLPAMKLYG+hcK7iYYBmXhnNZyhooKqeADiJq5rrokRUCJB3LNmxu17dt7KeXzRUbzgwPwF1chrePL7BMYqNkpI8rRSr00Rj2VNbGNFs/R/g8s5yMSA3keMdntTUucmYhfhqCamk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765877505; c=relaxed/simple; bh=QGg6sb2yB+41BEaYLZygHIG+7cfrrZARIjbJCAtn3rs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ZZVsTWy9k0gviUxDrzieFZdbsCkgjh/9w1TK8tYFVdvOTC7b7mtdgIgejunTfLrYRvqD+FneEGPoMg7auwHK7OMOa5CEOU36bcijDK8W97O0p6KGddBh9swGLPrtn+8p3KoobqIGWETgcNeTBRCEgi2VWzDUBtXQ9KulX3mo6+U= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ziyao.cc; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ziyao.cc; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ziyao.cc header.i=@ziyao.cc header.b=iKCo1Znw; arc=none smtp.client-ip=3.219.11.208 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ziyao.cc Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ziyao.cc Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ziyao.cc header.i=@ziyao.cc header.b="iKCo1Znw" Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-out.flockmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4dVsBd1DZ9z9s1K; Tue, 16 Dec 2025 09:31:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; bh=qEuALlOiDJ9ZM5Kch+ZSeYflabXsN0k3ETWKl4Tcqak=; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ziyao.cc; h=message-id:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:references:subject:date:to:cc:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to; q=dns/txt; s=titan1; t=1765877497; v=1; b=iKCo1Znw/mjhAX2JNSmn9nQxSVZHXrCWmBPMVh+16Q9qMoLSUsfEzpp0EwlkOgJ+zHbPxlAs b6hoD118G7L8nBkzuI8pzNhyVYVdXazKosdQO+FRHfcwMr7utZAcYlIaJ1Hxb4ktqbDzfQqEaZl 00GkJ+8I96DDgx4nf8/xfP6c= Received: from pie (unknown [117.171.66.90]) by smtp-out.flockmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4dVsBY3hPdz9s0L; Tue, 16 Dec 2025 09:31:32 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2025 09:31:28 +0000 Feedback-ID: :me@ziyao.cc:ziyao.cc:flockmailId From: Yao Zi To: Binbin Zhou , Binbin Zhou , Huacai Chen , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley Cc: Huacai Chen , Xuerui Wang , loongarch@lists.linux.dev, devicetree@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] LoongArch: DTS: Fix dtbs_check warnings Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-F-Verdict: SPFVALID X-Titan-Src-Out: 1765877496992165586.21635.5869125783113741254@prod-use1-smtp-out1003. X-CMAE-Score: 0 X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=TPG/S0la c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=694126f9 a=rBp+3XZz9uO5KTvnfbZ58A==:117 a=rBp+3XZz9uO5KTvnfbZ58A==:17 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=MKtGQD3n3ToA:10 a=CEWIc4RMnpUA:10 a=UEfRs4X7rQmhpc7QgncA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=3z85VNIBY5UIEeAh_hcH:22 a=NWVoK91CQySWRX1oVYDe:22 On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 03:54:35PM +0800, Binbin Zhou wrote: > Hi all: > > As Krzysztof pointed out in the OSS talk, LoongArch only has three DTS, > but has a bunch of warnings. The patchset attempts to fix them. > > Patch-1 and patch-3 are taken from Yao[1],thanks a lot! I'm fine with it, but should you add your own Sign-off-by to PATCH 1 and PATCH 3? Regards, Yao Zi