public inbox for devicetree@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Varadarajan Narayanan <varadarajan.narayanan@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@kernel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
	konradybcio@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org,
	conor+dt@kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq9574: Enable eMMC variant
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2026 11:47:52 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aWnYECCWECAXm1Jr@hu-varada-blr.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aVtAYqwmjPPRmWzV@sumit-xelite>

[ . . . ]
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * IPQ9574 RDP433 eMMC board variant device tree source
> > > > + *
> > > > + * Copyright (c) Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. and/or its subsidiaries.
> > > > + */
> > > > +
> > > > +/dts-v1/;
> > > > +
> > > > +#include "ipq9574-rdp433.dts"
> > >
> > > I find it discouraged practice. Although if Bjorn is fine with it, you
> > > still need proper compatibles.
> > >
> >
> > Nah, I don't fancy including .dts files. But I do see that I've let a
> > few of those slip by over the years.
> >
> > The general approach for these cases has been to rename dts->dtsi and
> > create the two dts files.
>
> That sounds better to me.
>
> >
> > I wonder though if this would be better served by an overlay, as it's
> > the same board, but with modifications applied?
>
> I am not sure how overlay is a better fit here. AFAIK, the DT overlay is
> generally used for plug and play hardware mezzanines. But here we are
> dealing with the default boot medium which can either be eMMC or NAND.
> Can a developer easily reverse the board modifications to boot from a
> different medium?
>
> And this DT is not only going to be consumed by the kernel but rather
> the bootloader (U-Boot) in this case where there isn't a concept of DT
> overlays which the prior stage can apply.

Bjorn/Dmitry/Sumit,

Will proceed with separate dts approach. Please let me know if that is
not ok.

Thanks
Varada

      reply	other threads:[~2026-01-16  6:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-02 10:46 [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq9574: Enable eMMC variant Varadarajan Narayanan
2026-01-02 11:08 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-01-02 20:09   ` Bjorn Andersson
2026-01-02 23:15     ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-01-05  4:38     ` Sumit Garg
2026-01-16  6:17       ` Varadarajan Narayanan [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aWnYECCWECAXm1Jr@hu-varada-blr.qualcomm.com \
    --to=varadarajan.narayanan@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=andersson@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=krzk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sumit.garg@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox