From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4023334F256; Fri, 13 Feb 2026 09:59:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.10 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770976790; cv=none; b=DmI8Hd/XOr29E1wLFLaSlnP2mIhxkF3xG/3ahAHrK1cxdEwg4ycfEo9t/33a0cUVSO5EB9DFHFvlQG9FIWTeupXj5z4oxkVQXFgXNzX1im9DeynC8amt/5xFhSYOS7/atHWFpoDNscHTD/+HQFzSAOQJchg7EY4uSVC7+r62M94= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770976790; c=relaxed/simple; bh=g4Px+rF4j2zO6sLf5t/WktofEyLTwzxfotiEC9NhgjA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Xd03siPUL1hDnPxZJ7LG5HBCVmm0rdZNXX30nounMIywqQajs0umKXiKTQp33P33OmkKNf4IuIpSlVjGZ/GGnp4r5cr2SfxUMon5MfhqspKX1r/WqJalhO2/8YDIvHVdJRvT/s0FsALSYjkBHWodMh2ei68EiVydnh20wlpuUYM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=mPb2bzmv; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.10 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="mPb2bzmv" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1770976788; x=1802512788; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=g4Px+rF4j2zO6sLf5t/WktofEyLTwzxfotiEC9NhgjA=; b=mPb2bzmvdmP4Y5/joPRFjlLbGRITg55tyx5GGc7LCpx8cLUuFvKVR07x 0BSJSLl/IKIDe9na9jGFSKn7MH2YoM1GXXM5w8UMcU+KkKdsmqxGoHJmC brzXUliYlnPDYKNKBvEJpod1zuRxaHPjv+bxfxnm3RYVlE8hWrvjdxwQN K+xK2cLAihZU/eQ22IPLYWt3TGFPwu5a7IA3OcARAVXmNU5iLGQYL95i8 VXUIJoA2m0nV9njCgwiG/RFTSEfhkLu9U7vmc5u4EYx6iDnLMuheu/1TX CNG+Pv9Asc9gA5d7out26cEXlLpm5luFYQ7CGjr+JSqA1vb+115j3yLQT Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: INJ6Kou5TC+juVFwl6FfKw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 7pA+dt7bRTelGoCUxNvH+g== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11699"; a="89571124" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,288,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="89571124" Received: from fmviesa003.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.143]) by orvoesa102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Feb 2026 01:59:47 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: s7Aj24DqSn6NXPib4aGpNQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: UuvcFjcfS5+WPe/RF/REOQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 Received: from pgcooper-mobl3.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.245.242]) by fmviesa003-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Feb 2026 01:59:45 -0800 Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2026 11:59:42 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: abdurrahman@nexthop.ai, Michal Simek , Andi Shyti , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 3/7] i2c: xiic: switch to generic device property accessors Message-ID: References: <20260213-i2c-xiic-v11-0-5d18aea11bde@nexthop.ai> <20260213-i2c-xiic-v11-3-5d18aea11bde@nexthop.ai> <738dbc7c-9915-4308-8e0b-388d6b73b067@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <738dbc7c-9915-4308-8e0b-388d6b73b067@kernel.org> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Fri, Feb 13, 2026 at 10:53:40AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 13/02/2026 01:15, Abdurrahman Hussain via B4 Relay wrote: > > Use generic device property accessors. > > You should explain here the impact, e.g. making them work for ACPI > platforms. Good suggestion! This all probably warrants a v12, but please, wait a few days. In any case we are in the middle of a merge window, not much activity is usually happening regarding to patch acceptance. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko