From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D6793AE6FE; Tue, 3 Feb 2026 15:45:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.11 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770133516; cv=none; b=HzLqjYPMVbnVk0EWrgwHnuBqQ3MzEGEpIpsjSdjz2bY6AEVBRoD0zSzNj9WXdqc7Bh6vXovvID/EhXlNzQfSUkXG5XjOz+b2W+Iuz4Yin5SafTMdTvLBX+iELbhYz5nJxYrDmFhh8gpFUslA/bhh8RAJl6iiGerj/Cns0Lu7pS0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770133516; c=relaxed/simple; bh=0x3vFQU8/eP9ntepQ8YV4JtZJnkkQ0g4VvYS3BjMUJ4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=nmFFicgliaa/JUsmTAoF0iLtrSRhD/EBP4qx+kRGg2P9+R5fbrFAr1u0oSUz3VySoPeNtJAH33bdBl50K99pKpmi1S/R29rAwI5abPHBwdGAbbSE16w7L8Hpnbipnig67ZxzBxIEGF9ACqNiSJW+ogXnbIA9Pq7P++fxCSHkAmQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=jD9uMYwl; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.11 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="jD9uMYwl" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1770133515; x=1801669515; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=0x3vFQU8/eP9ntepQ8YV4JtZJnkkQ0g4VvYS3BjMUJ4=; b=jD9uMYwly17XQ1TXXbuKPs3/IlQv1PvhQzEtOX3dy9Q0txhdRHaMOH2d XMNsnNXRhmsBCm2Q47uNVqEVJSovDDtH3nvyKF2BC4gexnDK9n22Rn7gd TWmGfMrvNZS2xRe92HFwUCMASBPVnP3OdnR5a2vNCqJ1x2GTJU168EpGc 0BH6LHoL8n3t9HsfDv0VSB2/EkdkDbPva/YxfAq8KQOyu8aGq4NwI4Qnj pTlxKRD0xwx2FgUktwyScYlItJnv0ZqocrR+frcNRgDumKhOY5oPyWnnK wjeKfG6f/AW68JvHxsauPjO34gz/JpGkXaM4E8e/UuOI1hAa/G9RYX9Fu g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: /fyqVB8rRIe5BQ2hp8C/UA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: F+r7ouDbQVWmMzMMnpxDyw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11690"; a="81621445" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,270,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="81621445" Received: from fmviesa005.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.145]) by orvoesa103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Feb 2026 07:45:14 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: XN+HF3k4S2Cl1Yo6oN3vLQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: BuX/WtSYRvWgfK4bwye7wQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,270,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="214363128" Received: from pgcooper-mobl3.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.245.99]) by fmviesa005-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Feb 2026 07:45:12 -0800 Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2026 17:45:10 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: abdurrahman@nexthop.ai Cc: Michal Simek , Andi Shyti , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 6/7] i2c: xiic: use numbered adapter registration Message-ID: References: <20260202-i2c-xiic-v9-0-ce4695f5267d@nexthop.ai> <20260202-i2c-xiic-v9-6-ce4695f5267d@nexthop.ai> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260202-i2c-xiic-v9-6-ce4695f5267d@nexthop.ai> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Mon, Feb 02, 2026 at 08:37:23PM +0000, Abdurrahman Hussain via B4 Relay wrote: > Use i2c_add_numbered_adapter() to allow platform devices to specify > fixed bus numbers when needed. Not sure about this. Doesn't it break the current approach? Please, double check that. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko