From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
To: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Cc: "Jonathan Cameron" <jic23@kernel.org>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
kernel@pengutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>,
"David Lechner" <dlechner@baylibre.com>,
"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
"David Jander" <david@protonic.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/13] iio: dac: ds4424: use device match data for chip info
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2026 11:59:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aYW7lt26Tn-6Fgno@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aYWe0-2KMLijFVh6@pengutronix.de>
On Fri, Feb 06, 2026 at 08:57:07AM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 05, 2026 at 08:43:25PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Tue, 3 Feb 2026 16:56:00 +0200
> > Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com> wrote:
...
> > > Just do not introduce that change (change of the ->name field) in the original
> > > patch, in that case no revert churn would be needed.
> > >
> > I think this got dealt with in discussion of next version but
> > safest route is just have an extra copy of the name in the
> > chip_info structure. Then we know it's stable against different
> > firmware types etc.
>
> Something like this?
Yes, but make it in the patch that introduces DT support.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-06 9:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-03 9:34 [PATCH v4 00/13] iio: dac: ds4424: add DS4402/DS4404 support and scale Oleksij Rempel
2026-02-03 9:34 ` [PATCH v4 01/13] iio: dac: ds4424: reject -128 RAW value Oleksij Rempel
2026-02-03 9:54 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-02-03 10:28 ` Oleksij Rempel
2026-02-03 11:52 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-02-05 20:41 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-02-03 9:34 ` [PATCH v4 02/13] iio: dac: ds4424: refactor raw access to use bitwise operations Oleksij Rempel
2026-02-03 9:34 ` [PATCH v4 03/13] iio: dac: ds4424: ratelimit read errors and use device context Oleksij Rempel
2026-02-03 9:34 ` [PATCH v4 04/13] iio: dac: ds4424: sort headers alphabetically Oleksij Rempel
2026-02-03 9:34 ` [PATCH v4 05/13] iio: dac: ds4424: rename iio_info struct to avoid ambiguity Oleksij Rempel
2026-02-03 9:55 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-02-03 9:34 ` [PATCH v4 06/13] iio: dac: ds4424: use device match data for chip info Oleksij Rempel
2026-02-03 10:03 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-02-03 10:17 ` Oleksij Rempel
2026-02-03 11:51 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-02-03 12:00 ` Oleksij Rempel
2026-02-03 14:56 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-02-05 20:43 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-02-06 7:57 ` Oleksij Rempel
2026-02-06 9:59 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2026-02-09 9:22 ` Oleksij Rempel
2026-02-09 10:29 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-02-03 9:34 ` [PATCH v4 07/13] iio: dac: ds4424: use fsleep() instead of usleep_range() Oleksij Rempel
2026-02-03 11:45 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-02-03 9:34 ` [PATCH v4 08/13] dt-bindings: iio: dac: maxim,ds4424: add ds4402/ds4404 Oleksij Rempel
2026-02-03 9:34 ` [PATCH v4 09/13] iio: dac: ds4424: add DS4402/DS4404 device IDs Oleksij Rempel
2026-02-03 9:34 ` [PATCH v4 10/13] iio: dac: ds4424: support per-variant output range limits Oleksij Rempel
2026-02-03 11:46 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-02-03 9:34 ` [PATCH v4 11/13] iio: dac: ds4424: convert to regmap Oleksij Rempel
2026-02-03 11:57 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-02-03 9:34 ` [PATCH v4 12/13] dt-bindings: iio: dac: maxim,ds4424: add maxim,rfs-ohms property Oleksij Rempel
2026-02-03 9:34 ` [PATCH v4 13/13] iio: dac: ds4424: add Rfs-based scale and per-variant limits Oleksij Rempel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aYW7lt26Tn-6Fgno@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=david@protonic.nl \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox