From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF1B4322A; Mon, 9 Feb 2026 10:29:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770632991; cv=none; b=RM8/CYfFA4mH3oVjTfr1VbgjtaZuTIszJRyx30epYUd0R1NNtz2lc6c0s1ko3cOH9uWl5tmqREkCMvMJt6v4bpYxMYUEdmFOULJGo2DyXr2HMWAAu/41Ddz7LvFhaM7+yE2/Fck5IM2NqpFArkxh5TIIqfWyhXmLsFcaIWxZxQA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770632991; c=relaxed/simple; bh=xZAYrTTulIZUYoCgEfQWTg7GfovcesjeRz77/U3qLpw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Agq3ygZ9unIHc+sY6/LzYwpFBazvDaNaoWeXcp5F5Ll2zfoG45u8xfH73+LP+cpaRdIgtQUW4Avf2zxTEYI2QS4S9lsLVEDPqH2np/QgWTNd0WyyVk58RDxCQ3KoJTyxOotSoTDMGPzV+9kZfspfWIAsE9fz0KNKS/t2nYrzX/0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=AuHYdjzQ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="AuHYdjzQ" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1770632991; x=1802168991; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=xZAYrTTulIZUYoCgEfQWTg7GfovcesjeRz77/U3qLpw=; b=AuHYdjzQCkoVb7/uJiKqNr8c+FrmvZeX06JoDfBEg67ELXQ6pfLLT00Q BRPZOeWj3+ER7ExkMAjTLlk/b1OecQHRbtUgGuF/Ye4+KdX1FBkfxUCDr Ymp0lPpy3DMmqG23RP698HYWymWX2fKVpNDkwem8I8XnWJ/4InuJs2+P8 TMB8pZYlRcKf58Ea71U+xRd/JJu9ElBuRzIltbhLUOXfNf29G81RwM1Z8 PWJ1SWBhg/52Vwtd/gACe2p1/w/V6JBlQPH9AVH7IX6mXFeWzZv20jLQq a3HFE5mZy4rDOzR59LHJKzQ63VylM6vuiO29uFEqQyfNc4CY9txqQMI3W g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: fMGkYcOUT2eUJ+pHrmr/Nw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: Z6trS8AdRXmEE1Ado0l4MA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11695"; a="59307693" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,282,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="59307693" Received: from orviesa010.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.150]) by fmvoesa110.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Feb 2026 02:29:50 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: wPkm/+a5QT+WbU9iN08AwQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: aGNt7k67TQa/UZrfTT3jng== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,282,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="210855132" Received: from pgcooper-mobl3.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.245.128]) by orviesa010-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Feb 2026 02:29:47 -0800 Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2026 12:29:44 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Oleksij Rempel Cc: Jonathan Cameron , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , kernel@pengutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Andy Shevchenko , David Lechner , Nuno =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=E1?= , David Jander Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/13] iio: dac: ds4424: use device match data for chip info Message-ID: References: <20260203093434.2548978-7-o.rempel@pengutronix.de> <20260205204325.5bd09d97@jic23-huawei> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Mon, Feb 09, 2026 at 10:22:13AM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote: > On Fri, Feb 06, 2026 at 11:59:50AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 06, 2026 at 08:57:07AM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 05, 2026 at 08:43:25PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > > > On Tue, 3 Feb 2026 16:56:00 +0200 > > > > Andy Shevchenko wrote: ... > > > > > Just do not introduce that change (change of the ->name field) in the original > > > > > patch, in that case no revert churn would be needed. > > > > > > > > > I think this got dealt with in discussion of next version but > > > > safest route is just have an extra copy of the name in the > > > > chip_info structure. Then we know it's stable against different > > > > firmware types etc. > > > > > > Something like this? > > > > Yes, but make it in the patch that introduces DT support. > > Hm, I'm not sure what do you mean. There is no patch which "introduces > DT support" in this series. Do you mean, this one: > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260204140045.390677-7-o.rempel@pengutronix.de/ Yes, I meant that one. > Or should it be better a separate patch? Perhaps just after the above mentioned one. Either works for me. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko