From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.zeus03.de (zeus03.de [194.117.254.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43E3E369210 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2026 10:56:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770634590; cv=none; b=MKREVmWG9Rme0dSJoApBqswBgOG0Di7XIr4qdKNzs/OJyjTU0L8omCpDfR2UxILqRSS9HOhPJTQbLZOVWteLfQAyc3+lN81NQRB/FMJeRyJMBqbLePqUx7i8d+b6nQC+n7F7E/iijTinD589p4pFPnUjpys2sMic6mRqLZnM4MY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770634590; c=relaxed/simple; bh=VdZYgGmDzLJyy5KARWDiIoXEtcW6cUiBB9Fl1Nla4rk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=KKBhh0+7Hux88EnfzmZGmIgb8MHzaLFJR2qJ45QEVh/xLqCXrDDxbppHKqD6Pub450oYSU89fpZGiFrQuFwBoxbgKEzgg4Aj3bHBTiK2Y/XExsee9auOrK89xbJQW/OCIL01X2RA8LcWbNKholPNaJR1NDNjHsUz3/CKN2PuzfY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b=C6ZryzX3; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b="C6ZryzX3" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= sang-engineering.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=k1; bh=osD3 4MbzJ4JrKQn3MCvbtOMiNFpo9ySJ1s2YZPh08rQ=; b=C6ZryzX3Y5PvV8l1Myip t/ZAGbkwv50pNWo+70g/68Dw34JTGRKTYQFAz98W4MwuPXt4QUDNfriFr6PLApvl OSoRxNCOmv5CyOTz4jPZ5lDqWUbmiWWuWAJfRxzpRMqFU2IvHTQSKqP0T6GIvADa td3CHyEnKzYviQZUcFrPder3/8HF7YtFngtUNngMDzTSEF4r/N5zXom0Xcvdz82g s1JaOBy5Y4ezNqrxLlAYGJv+nBvMPhpgWs639uI2GrZK0NlRrMd2z5Riul0gbMVg SKKhnQLm3bKUfuBIFNjKVZYgM5aT6W49RSy7yEYbonQLOpqLFPBqMpACFEoDr5cA ew== Received: (qmail 1131709 invoked from network); 9 Feb 2026 11:56:26 +0100 Received: by mail.zeus03.de with UTF8SMTPSA (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted, authenticated); 9 Feb 2026 11:56:26 +0100 X-UD-Smtp-Session: l3s3148p1@4MeG/WFKyuwujnuv Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2026 11:56:25 +0100 From: Wolfram Sang To: Marek Vasut Cc: Cristian Marussi , Sudeep Holla , arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org, Conor Dooley , Florian Fainelli , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Rob Herring , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] firmware: arm_scmi: Implement arm,no-completion-irq property Message-ID: References: <20260117010241.186685-1-marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org> <20260117010241.186685-2-marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org> <9175b8aa-18c6-4dc1-8904-c26fa1dc7428@mailbox.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9175b8aa-18c6-4dc1-8904-c26fa1dc7428@mailbox.org> Hi all, > > > Implement new property arm,no-completion-irq, which sets all SCMI > > > operation into poll mode. This is meant to work around uncooperative > > > SCP implementations, which do not generate completion interrupts. > > > This applies to mbox/shmem based implementations. > > > > > > With this property set, such implementations which do not generate > > > interrupts can be interacted with, until they are fixed to generate > > > interrupts properly. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut > > > --- ... > > > > LGTM. > > > > Reviewed-by: Cristian Marussi > > Is there anything left to do with these patches, or can this now be picked > up ? Would love to see this going in. I also work with the firmware which needs this functionality. All the best, Wolfram