From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B019C1C8603; Mon, 9 Feb 2026 13:00:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770642034; cv=none; b=kbbNsQ9K8rKbVKiorPP0eBn0V7Z1VX1YA2rUL/ZxA9kIRnN+DsW0GE+efMMWM2iclBhKGjIY5bG8vy3BEbxfifhSwPBqQSVdpxA56Pdgl/lx0c8E4G0mDRVNSBDk/i7U2KYjCSLR1CyOyRDJGWAXL4ODwSSHVbWuBHWrC1p2avo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770642034; c=relaxed/simple; bh=MqENoUlrZcSSK0UNEd5cVb/7bfOg7Y8qXBBaAL7dvvc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ivCLFdxy3Jd5eSuG8RJ2XrmmKda2a7logGqC4hJLSboUOYyAQ12+vA6G1jRI+7xyWDYXBqx+p0oFzj6LleZSh9wv8wia09KZGybype+uW0/b1arfAwQJqXwJdDBPm169hQWHObh4McPLUwG27R/7c93Lpv0v9lLyaYX48qEGk7c= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AB09339; Mon, 9 Feb 2026 05:00:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from pluto (usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DCACE3F740; Mon, 9 Feb 2026 05:00:30 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2026 13:00:23 +0000 From: Cristian Marussi To: Wolfram Sang Cc: Marek Vasut , Cristian Marussi , Sudeep Holla , arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org, Conor Dooley , Florian Fainelli , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Rob Herring , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] firmware: arm_scmi: Implement arm,no-completion-irq property Message-ID: References: <20260117010241.186685-1-marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org> <20260117010241.186685-2-marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org> <9175b8aa-18c6-4dc1-8904-c26fa1dc7428@mailbox.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Mon, Feb 09, 2026 at 11:56:25AM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > Hi all, > > > > > Implement new property arm,no-completion-irq, which sets all SCMI > > > > operation into poll mode. This is meant to work around uncooperative > > > > SCP implementations, which do not generate completion interrupts. > > > > This applies to mbox/shmem based implementations. > > > > > > > > With this property set, such implementations which do not generate > > > > interrupts can be interacted with, until they are fixed to generate > > > > interrupts properly. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut > > > > --- > > ... > > > > > > > LGTM. > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Cristian Marussi > > > > Is there anything left to do with these patches, or can this now be picked > > up ? > > Would love to see this going in. I also work with the firmware which > needs this functionality. I have not seen anymore push back around this, but I think it was late anyway to be picked up as an update for this cycle given that it was already -rc6 when the last series landed...so I guess it could picked up now for the next cycle ...but I have not checked with Sudeep.. Thanks, Cristian