From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E90239E165; Tue, 24 Feb 2026 13:43:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.19 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771940635; cv=none; b=j9M5wsfJRsI2QKPCz/mj+cTDGhBFYIAwyD1her5TOAGpJDwFNIq3dSaCmR7SPpTbS8UW32hrLgKMe4HJT7+krzEz7SuhlcMNkLwVu6HcPC0eYTDIzL4cstLmK5OIaT7fzm4U/6s6GVGqnW0mKsFYUkUwuwg0kB2CW62zYG532QE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771940635; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+t5aKoNjIPhOd9K1poo0UKcJ+36BKbW+aSsCCaKoG14=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=pg24MDN/q40QBA/4wA/9/OcjgNdnD/kWpApy/Fc/v6S5gMXY6pyxNL8ywR2dlzWVk+twWX1/ljWPaDYzXsXoO8IQkLm0C5+wCDxarR/npMAupr0ymPKDtqz2BGsx9dApebzM22dZqSTaLYs8AGiclq/2sFd3R4QgQDEoXYw4png= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=Kd8/vhUC; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.19 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="Kd8/vhUC" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1771940634; x=1803476634; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=+t5aKoNjIPhOd9K1poo0UKcJ+36BKbW+aSsCCaKoG14=; b=Kd8/vhUCvoUnqAzhLZqGDPXVRpYaHj+5X7Xbr03NxOTKZzusttWM1xLp 0Pk5WnVCbRok9eLSvaFIvk7FurFyRTlGSsS4diyhrE8ExBtQj7uSr6lPq eAc2rx+3TrMU3MRW6wIB8Jk4zsOa+Ykmu6FlwIP6MGbqU1nM8/VR7RMVF 6Nwe2HEnzkD1TKZeUDOHSVkP+aMHvzJuqTTXRH+UCayDUaGFvKZNJXKsg DIvMevOMn8kcJYUmwxmlBxALc3ltTxD8Tb9F7AumXNs/vhlbzHtXIRXwz 4Ig62eZMrLf+viB5OtfdYhQLRBglbc3P5YsD2rniRJvih3Qu8wH44Yr47 w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: EXHHYlmVRWaGcG+1Rarf8g== X-CSE-MsgGUID: DeOhQ/H/S/m95FFXryS/2A== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11710"; a="71984591" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,308,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="71984591" Received: from fmviesa002.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.142]) by fmvoesa113.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Feb 2026 05:43:54 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: VwgeB/n+QMuEGXx1BO9WSQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: OcOvuEvcQlaLOenfkvoRPg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,308,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="238892016" Received: from egrumbac-mobl6.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.244.146]) by fmviesa002-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Feb 2026 05:43:52 -0800 Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2026 15:43:50 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Conor Dooley , Jonathan Cameron , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Randy Dunlap Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] memory: bt1-l2-ctl: Remove not-going-to-be-supported code for Baikal SoC Message-ID: References: <20260224115830.3501050-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <2bf95220-aaa7-48dc-a3f5-c5fd43c6ae67@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2bf95220-aaa7-48dc-a3f5-c5fd43c6ae67@kernel.org> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Tue, Feb 24, 2026 at 01:05:24PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 24/02/2026 12:58, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > As noticed in the discussion [1] the Baikal SoC and platforms > > are not going to be finalized, hence remove stale code. > You got the feedback from Rob, so please implement it in all new patches > PAST that feedback. No need to resend old ones, but if you are making > new work - respect that feedback. I misinterpreted his reply. Will fix this in next version. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko