Re: [PATCH v7 1/3] dt-bindings: net: Add ti,cc1352p7

[Ayush Singh <ayushdevel1325@gmail.com>]

>> Signed-off-by: Ayush Singh <ayushdevel1325@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>   .../devicetree/bindings/net/ti,cc1352p7.yaml  | 51 +++++++++++++++++++
>>   MAINTAINERS                                   |  6 +++
>>   2 files changed, 57 insertions(+)
>>   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,cc1352p7.yaml
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,cc1352p7.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,cc1352p7.yaml
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..291ba34c389b
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,cc1352p7.yaml
>> @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause
>> +%YAML 1.2
>> +---
>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/net/ti,cc1352p7.yaml#
>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>> +
>> +title: Texas Instruments Simplelink CC1352P7 wireless MCU
>> +
>> +description:
>> +  The cc1352p7 mcu can be connected via SPI or UART.
>> +
>> +maintainers:
>> +  - Ayush Singh <ayushdevel1325@gmail.com>
>> +
>> +properties:
>> +  compatible:
>> +    const: ti,cc1352p7
>> +
>> +  clocks:
>> +    maxItems: 2
>> +
>> +  clock-names:
>> +    description:
>> +      sclk_hf is the main system (mcu and peripherals) clock
>> +      sclk_lf is low-frequency system clock
> This does no go here, but to clocks. I wrote how it should be done.
> Don't ignore the feedback.
It was suggested to use `clock-names` by Nishanth Menon in the previous 
email, so I thought this was what it meant. I will remove clock-names if 
that's better.
>> +    items:
>> +      - const: sclk_hf
>> +      - const: sclk_lf
>> +
>> +  reset-gpios: true
>
> No, really, why do you change correct code into incorrect one? Who asked
> you to drop maxItems?
I found that many bindings (`display/ilitek,ili9486.yaml`, 
`iio/dac/adi,ad5758.yaml`) use this pattern instead of `maxItems` for 
`reset-gpios`. So I assumed it was some sort of convention. I will 
change it back to `maxItems`.


Sincerely,

Ayush Singh