From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Cc: corbet@lwn.net, skhan@linuxfoundation.org,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, chenhuacai@kernel.org,
kernel@xen0n.name, maddy@linux.ibm.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
npiggin@gmail.com, chleroy@kernel.org, pjw@kernel.org,
palmer@dabbelt.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, alex@ghiti.fr,
tglx@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, hpa@zytor.com, robh@kernel.org,
saravanak@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
vgoyal@redhat.com, dyoung@redhat.com, rdunlap@infradead.org,
pmladek@suse.com, dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com, kees@kernel.org,
paulmck@kernel.org, lirongqing@baidu.com, fvdl@google.com,
rppt@kernel.org, ardb@kernel.org, leitao@debian.org,
sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com, jbohac@suse.cz, cfsworks@gmail.com,
osandov@fb.com, tangyouling@kylinos.cn, ritesh.list@gmail.com,
hbathini@linux.ibm.com, eajames@linux.ibm.com,
songshuaishuai@tinylab.org, kevin.brodsky@arm.com,
samuel.holland@sifive.com, vishal.moola@gmail.com,
junhui.liu@pigmoral.tech, coxu@redhat.com, liaoyuanhong@vivo.com,
fuqiang.wang@easystack.cn, brgerst@gmail.com, x86@kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/5] arm64/riscv: Add support for crashkernel CMA reservation
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2026 10:12:45 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aa9-HYdKT8MhAjhi@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260302035315.3892241-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
On 03/02/26 at 11:53am, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
> The crash memory allocation, and the exclude of crashk_res, crashk_low_res
> and crashk_cma memory are almost identical across different architectures,
> This patch set handle them in crash core in a general way, which eliminate
> a lot of duplication code.
>
> And add support for crashkernel CMA reservation for arm64 and riscv.
>
> Rebased on v7.0-rc1.
>
> Basic second kernel boot test were performed on QEMU platforms for x86,
> ARM64, and RISC-V architectures with the following parameters:
>
> "cma=256M crashkernel=256M crashkernel=64M,cma"
The whole series looks good to me, thanks.
Acked-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-10 2:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-02 3:53 [PATCH v8 0/5] arm64/riscv: Add support for crashkernel CMA reservation Jinjie Ruan
2026-03-02 3:53 ` [PATCH v8 1/5] powerpc/crash: sort crash memory ranges before preparing elfcorehdr Jinjie Ruan
2026-03-02 3:53 ` [PATCH v8 2/5] crash: Exclude crash kernel memory in crash core Jinjie Ruan
2026-03-02 5:53 ` Sourabh Jain
2026-03-23 9:12 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-03-02 3:53 ` [PATCH v8 3/5] crash: Use crash_exclude_core_ranges() on powerpc Jinjie Ruan
2026-03-02 5:59 ` Sourabh Jain
2026-03-02 3:53 ` [PATCH v8 4/5] arm64: kexec: Add support for crashkernel CMA reservation Jinjie Ruan
2026-03-13 21:56 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2026-03-02 3:53 ` [PATCH v8 5/5] riscv: " Jinjie Ruan
2026-03-10 1:34 ` [PATCH v8 0/5] arm64/riscv: " Jinjie Ruan
2026-03-10 2:12 ` Baoquan He [this message]
2026-03-23 1:44 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-03-23 1:58 ` Andrew Morton
2026-03-23 2:15 ` Jinjie Ruan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aa9-HYdKT8MhAjhi@MiWiFi-R3L-srv \
--to=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cfsworks@gmail.com \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=coxu@redhat.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=eajames@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=fuqiang.wang@easystack.cn \
--cc=fvdl@google.com \
--cc=hbathini@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jbohac@suse.cz \
--cc=junhui.liu@pigmoral.tech \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel@xen0n.name \
--cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=liaoyuanhong@vivo.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=lirongqing@baidu.com \
--cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=osandov@fb.com \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=pjw@kernel.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
--cc=samuel.holland@sifive.com \
--cc=saravanak@kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=songshuaishuai@tinylab.org \
--cc=sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tangyouling@kylinos.cn \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=vishal.moola@gmail.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox