On Tue, Feb 10, 2026 at 06:33:35PM +0100, Herve Codina wrote:
> fdt_check_full() makes the assumption that a FDT_END tag is present
> immediately after the FDT_END_NODE tag related to the root node.
> 
> This assumption is not correct. Indeed, FDT_NOP tags can be present
> between this FDT_END_NODE tag and the FDT_END tag.
> 
> Handle those possible FDT_NOP tags.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>

Merged, thanks.

> ---
>  libfdt/fdt_check.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/libfdt/fdt_check.c b/libfdt/fdt_check.c
> index a21ebbc..cca0523 100644
> --- a/libfdt/fdt_check.c
> +++ b/libfdt/fdt_check.c
> @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ int fdt_check_full(const void *fdt, size_t bufsize)
>  			return nextoffset;
>  
>  		/* If we see two root nodes, something is wrong */
> -		if (expect_end && tag != FDT_END)
> +		if (expect_end && tag != FDT_END && tag != FDT_NOP)
>  			return -FDT_ERR_BADSTRUCTURE;
>  
>  		switch (tag) {
> -- 
> 2.52.0
> 
> 

-- 
David Gibson (he or they)	| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you, not the other way
				| around.
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson