From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy McNicoll Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] pinctrl: qcom: Add msm8994 pinctrl driver Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 16:22:53 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20161031160009.20472-1-michael.scott@linaro.org> <20161101235344.GX16026@codeaurora.org> <20161102183607.GJ16026@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20161102183607.GJ16026-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Stephen Boyd , Michael Scott Cc: linux-gpio-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-msm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Linus Walleij , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Andy Gross , David Brown , Bjorn Andersson , Joonwoo Park , Jeremy McNicoll List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 2016-11-02 11:36 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 11/01, Michael Scott wrote: >> >> On 11/01/2016 04:53 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: >>> On 10/31, Michael Scott wrote: >>>> + >>>> +static const struct msm_pingroup msm8994_groups[] = { >>>> + PINGROUP(0, blsp_spi1, blsp_uart1, blsp_uim1, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, >>>> + NA, NA), >>> I see an hdmi_rcv group here after blsp_uim1. Please add it for >>> this gpio. >> >> Hi Stephen, >> >> Thank you for reviewing the data-- this is really tedious stuff. >> >> I'd like to make sure that we're both using tech data for msm8994. >> I don't see the hdmi_rcv function at all in my docs. >> >>> >>>> + PINGROUP(1, blsp_spi1, blsp_uart1, blsp_uim1, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, >>>> + NA, NA), >>>> + PINGROUP(2, blsp_spi1, blsp_uart1, blsp_i2c1, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, >>>> + NA, NA), >>>> + PINGROUP(3, blsp_spi1, blsp_uart1, blsp_i2c1, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, >>>> + NA, NA), >>>> + PINGROUP(4, blsp_spi2, blsp_uart2, blsp_uim2, qdss_cti_trig_out_b, >>>> + NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA), >>>> + PINGROUP(5, blsp_spi2, blsp_uart2, blsp_uim2, qdss_cti_trig_in_b, NA, >>> The qdss_cti_* is in function 5 for both of these, not function >>> 4. >> These are indeed wrong, but my docs both show as function 7. > > Ok. I think your document is for 8994v1, which never got > commercialized. I certainly see that this function assignment > changed between v1 and v2 from 7 to 5. > This is a case where not having the docs and only downstream code as a reference is probably a good thing (tm), although the downstream code may end up hurting more than helping. -jeremy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html