From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net [23.128.96.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAEAFBA50 for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 11:42:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=tweaklogic.com header.i=@tweaklogic.com header.b="Y18zZWQp" Received: from mail-pf1-x42e.google.com (mail-pf1-x42e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F406B128 for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 04:42:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x42e.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-6b77ab73c6fso1430927b3a.1 for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 04:42:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tweaklogic.com; s=google; t=1698406939; x=1699011739; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Ui+0X6RaOuqdgWAsDjJ4EPnCuY3qudStVnPGxxdS4w8=; b=Y18zZWQpSkvMLu0XXlyA6JQoWdUREYAxQDTsdJNFo3Tq/+VDNUIaOvVVJOdO1MmLEr ndVDcNmK3RieV7zzy6ezk/H7kub7nEYjx/fRLkH1+YOXxrWBzEtuFhycdMPlPSIr0o8H i68slCGay+rBE5gacmWSta6+h9uCCD8obwrBEEs7qYSPV9Q6I3zEbKt1HQjGpW/h+KVK bmgZ3KbjYIaV8UsR9eHsMO4q+asXhPwjlkqLDfyQv2Jwv+i3LwFOJ+zpEKtM63neh2Sz X9EyJKFSDL/Y4ap1ygwOL/0jpOk1ihEHXvZj3u+gb4iCfBx91Q0sRtlZAj8AamjE1JYm NT4g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1698406939; x=1699011739; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Ui+0X6RaOuqdgWAsDjJ4EPnCuY3qudStVnPGxxdS4w8=; b=XV7v7xap9Qq6e6y07xZ6Y4PYIIfH5LlGsqDwkGcTmIgFbsBwezgSJyRdW3zzEgviSW Hh8pALbnOaVtTweAf24EdGdEUfRRsOOVzFKFBJSTQ8jBJf1jEEbhn86nZvGD53Mq0yny RQt0k+/mzi02v7Y5CMYbdm71vfgyDRg4GOKlsEfG1kKB92lbnMaXupUt3Ho7EJeEp4Qh Iak5Xf0Ddiy2unDzsqJs++rvxrZG5DBBVv0mFrCORzGi3aF+iaygsYfwUgOOuuT801bL PWYK+n0C44JGjJpRCVbAAEBtgmypAGtrVW1mhGWuKkEgmjPRWZrOczFD4x58mHh9jyHY 9HeA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxTh4ewjU9Q6XTm2u0vwfJJW6hfgefxgJdGXW8Gzgyd738Wtrs3 yWM1rrlGf1ebFgHlC8tjOJmMjA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGGyKRa3hQHUhJilPpV747GjhOTRZGEgbsYmHh2pSPtU1N4qqaDf2+sIRpTV6aCdutQx9ddqg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:230d:b0:68c:44ed:fb6 with SMTP id h13-20020a056a00230d00b0068c44ed0fb6mr3387285pfh.16.1698406939330; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 04:42:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2403:580d:82f4:0:c232:f53e:32d4:5510? (2403-580d-82f4-0-c232-f53e-32d4-5510.ip6.aussiebb.net. [2403:580d:82f4:0:c232:f53e:32d4:5510]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e21-20020aa78c55000000b0069ee4242f89sm1228768pfd.13.2023.10.27.04.42.13 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 27 Oct 2023 04:42:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 22:12:11 +1030 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] iio: light: Add support for APDS9306 Light Sensor Content-Language: en-US To: Krzysztof Kozlowski , Jonathan Cameron , Lars-Peter Clausen , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Matti Vaittinen , Andy Shevchenko , Paul Gazzillo Cc: Matt Ranostay , Stefan Windfeldt-Prytz , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20231027074545.6055-1-subhajit.ghosh@tweaklogic.com> <20231027074545.6055-3-subhajit.ghosh@tweaklogic.com> <9e55b561-a0ad-4503-9f20-b7c98507afa0@tweaklogic.com> From: Subhajit Ghosh In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 27/10/23 21:34, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 27/10/2023 10:42, Subhajit Ghosh wrote: >> 4. Conor reviewed the patch and said that it would be better that I handle all >> these operations in apds9306 driver (this) patch series rather than submitting >> a new patch. >> "Ahh apologies then. The best course of action would likely be to include >> the patch merging the two bindings in your series adding the third user." >> 5. As per this patch series -- RFC->v0->v1-v2 > > RFC was the first version sent to mailing list. So after RFC there is > second version - v2. This is v4. Acknowledging all your other comments. Appreciate your time and effort in reviewing this. One last question on this - So what version should I use for the patchset which I will submit next - "v3" or "v5" in the Subject of the emails? Regards, Subhajit Ghosh