From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.zeus03.de (zeus03.de [194.117.254.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA28E3BD62F for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2026 08:32:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773217978; cv=none; b=lkNdZALMXV88pVTlf9/l2zWjPibwnpwFhR+5tEeFcNS/ogRu33OB9ziAIgRQU3iICXBrhBArrEi9UbixEpMdoqvywrGr7T4AAEHKe/KKTab0CvZCZ2oR2mSn7Zms12TeoHiY0tlC/sJfA/Rp9b3tnm5fyDbul54lwMIvHryieZo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773217978; c=relaxed/simple; bh=CCxrS9skmRpl8jND9v4vYlK+FQev5wTRfod1SOCisDQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=FGhmwhIBRlVTY98CegYok2xPPqWsG1XDKdJFccid6fqj37XfVynJUpCIRm6uYVW+xNBjNYZ+vdW7CppeZETPil3mGIjZi5cDyMhjAaq3Y1QoRmzy8RlVlRNsEGIjJ3+19mn0GdoaJWnXzK81iWtTIehDJuDUObRrE9FJgK9Nr+4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b=FODQ7j1b; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b="FODQ7j1b" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= sang-engineering.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=k1; bh=7LG9 PxpeOLthDVAZ4NlKI126O57wQkSgQ5aDzvQFM5Q=; b=FODQ7j1biQ3Qo31WrK4f uShRRzabA/dPwrPNza0DQC0WyM5sj+agS9Cx//q+xT+5ZE0YNCQfZ02Oi7tWEXe3 W1w9MUkThwyLTRTThd1A8d4nYZUZ7Spu7mA3qGxZaPR8Lukl9FDzM/B97vn3XxuH pX0xA3OnVhxTeX3Nc8akwmA0DaicvFAdNz4AkE0y1khFsreH6bdeXfY2KoHgZUYz RSpxoVrIH32f6nVdgCmY0iO0mQrRGVmsnOIzHEB8n1+7QjnMKbo43RsKBHHwkFT3 +bCW6u0DaF3QstmzbCSv959BVOTvoxJTiQxSWBy6241X2M5+8Y2rLcjMoBEAa5q/ Qw== Received: (qmail 3564918 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2026 09:32:53 +0100 Received: by mail.zeus03.de with UTF8SMTPSA (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted, authenticated); 11 Mar 2026 09:32:53 +0100 X-UD-Smtp-Session: l3s3148p1@2G5ue7tMousujnut Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2026 09:32:53 +0100 From: Wolfram Sang To: "Herve Codina (Schneider Electric)" Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , Magnus Damm , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Pascal Eberhard , Miquel Raynal , Thomas Petazzoni Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: r9a06g032: Add #address-cells in the GIC node Message-ID: References: <20260303102029.147359-1-herve.codina@bootlin.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="m42m2ThPRCHUbJ3r" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260303102029.147359-1-herve.codina@bootlin.com> --m42m2ThPRCHUbJ3r Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Mar 03, 2026 at 11:20:29AM +0100, Herve Codina (Schneider Electric)= wrote: > When checking dts involving the r9a06g032.dtsi file, the following kind > of warnings are reported: > Missing property '#address-cells' in node xxx, using 0 as fallback >=20 > Indeed, #address-cells is not present in the GIC interrupt controller > node. >=20 > Fix it adding the missing property. >=20 > No functional change. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Herve Codina (Schneider Electric) Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang I like Krzysztof's explanation "Value '0' is correct because GIC interrupt controller does not have children." Maybe it can be added to the commit message? --m42m2ThPRCHUbJ3r Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAmmxKLUACgkQFA3kzBSg KbaBjQ//d28BBGk3XivQJnpk2guNJqhhbJ1ai8OE+9mvi4M1+O8DrB0zOkLDcVM2 4Lymij+KVDppD2TTQ9uNYxK10YrdQ4w2oKG/5+Inp3z6mdD1ntoI1HkgdFVd6CkA r3u/PWNrsN2VMMnrp6z6tdfeC8cM3SucJX2t1BxOVfjHxR1WKWuXFwIWuTHXnOw8 hOTuckx+G+cWwL6Fvukzliqe2aOf0p9RvewMppeaymM27ik7l1RQbNvj/BBSqHj7 AL7LviBWUoTnhl4P3pzKnSw8uA+8woK00xbs0TCU/lSLmzm8x3DDBe++3YTnHJe/ Q7TqkO0gzRXQ1jue7MevhaunG8P6IuuiBEv2qbFf53Od37rwhFuGBAeknSYpGUFJ wOMO+6AFt0+9l45KTzjBuZyvaCeXUViW2FgS0XHa206jdmuk2Vk/3ps/LMhMma9W 6S9ucoZvLQ6WGySfSUjxNwvglCKnjkIJshN7a6O9jn185kFv6HqPxf5vnmvjJVSq 6Buon7j/t0HsO9FLOxDQAfy+wHKcN6ZTNR+lNccc6Tb0P6Lgoh5lxkxUbn4Q7/Ys MkfRx5PS6Sm8VyBuZmmOclJvU0i49dz93SovIa2RJvdHuz8wiHna6PMMvN+AQdjE XeCN6DDXSnxTF3srZiWE45D1zDOuS1lUBp35kQMYaScnUHB1SYE= =WsKJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --m42m2ThPRCHUbJ3r--