public inbox for devicetree@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
To: Elson Serrao <elson.serrao@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
	Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@kernel.org>,
	Wesley Cheng <quic_wcheng@quicinc.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/1] dt-bindings: connector: Add role‑switch provider phandle
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2026 15:23:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <abFszhkrN_X1ax8U@kuha> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c57cc1cd-c7cd-41d5-adef-c2e69de72f46@oss.qualcomm.com>

Mon, Mar 09, 2026 at 01:41:20PM -0700, Elson Serrao kirjoitti:
> 
> 
> On 2/24/2026 10:56 AM, Elson Serrao wrote:
> > +Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
> > 
> > Adding Heikki since this relates to usb-role-switch provider modeling.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Elson
> > 
> > On 2/23/2026 11:10 AM, Elson Serrao wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> This RFC proposes a generic Devicetree mechanism for a USB connector to
> >> reference the USB role‑switch provider when there is an intermediate,
> >> block between the connector and the controller in the OF graph.
> >>
> >> Problem
> >> =======
> >> OF‑graph links are strictly point‑to‑point via remote-endpoint, so a
> >> consumer can only discover its immediate neighbor in the graph. When an
> >> intermediate node sits between the USB connector and the controller, the
> >> connector cannot identify the controller (the role‑switch provider) from
> >> the graph alone.
> >>
> 
> [...]
> 
> Gentle ping on this RFC.
> 
> When you have a moment, I’d appreciate guidance on whether the proposed
> modeling direction looks acceptable.
> 
> For context only, the following DTS patch illustrates this modeling:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260309203337.803986-11-elson.serrao@oss.qualcomm.com/

FWIW you proposal is okay by me.

thanks,

-- 
heikki

      reply	other threads:[~2026-03-11 13:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-23 19:10 [RFC PATCH 0/1] dt-bindings: connector: Add role‑switch provider phandle Elson Serrao
2026-02-23 19:10 ` [RFC PATCH 1/1] " Elson Serrao
2026-02-24 18:56 ` [RFC PATCH 0/1] " Elson Serrao
2026-03-09 20:41   ` Elson Serrao
2026-03-11 13:23     ` Heikki Krogerus [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=abFszhkrN_X1ax8U@kuha \
    --to=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andersson@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=elson.serrao@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=quic_wcheng@quicinc.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox