Re: Support for Lenovo IdeaCentre Mini X (Purwa)

[Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>]

On 4/30/26 7:22 PM, Mostafa Saleh wrote:
> Hi Konrad,
> 
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2026 at 06:48:33PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> On 4/29/26 4:18 PM, Mostafa Saleh wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I see that recently the support for “Lenovo IdeaCentre Mini X” was
>>> added [1]
>>> However, unfortunately that doesn’t work for my device, the board
>>> resets once I try to boot the kernel from UEFI.
>>>
>>> I believe that’s because it is another variant, as I have been using
>>> my device tree for some time[2] which is hacked based on the crd
>>> device tree with some trial and error. With that I can boot with
>>> PCI/NVME/Ethernet and USB (there are also some other errors in the
>>> log related PMIC), this device tree is based on purwa.dtsi unlike
>>> the upstream one which use hamoa.dtsi.
>>>
>>> Are there any plans to support the Purwa based variant? I am happy to
>>> help with testing, but I can’t confidently send patches as my device
>>> tree is based on trial and error rather than a data sheet.

[...]

> I can try to see the differences and build another dt on top of the
> hamoa one, but that will also be based on trial and error rather than
> actual knowledge, I am happy to test patches if you have other
> suggestions.

Hm, I ran a quick diff and even though there's a lot of noise (mostly
due to the same things being named slightly differently), the actual
meat and potatoes aren't very different at all, e.g. the PHY regulators
are the same

Could you post the full dmesg with both DTs?

Konrad