devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maulik Shah <mkshah@codeaurora.org>
To: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>,
	agross@kernel.org, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org,
	robh+dt@kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/14] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add RSC and PDC devices
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2021 10:51:04 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ac4f5cf8-0bf0-b7c3-2d50-ae7d48cbc885@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <31bf64c5-26a4-dc23-3769-df7a7559083b@codeaurora.org>

Hi,

On 3/5/2021 11:12 AM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>
> On 3/4/2021 5:34 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> Quoting Rajendra Nayak (2021-03-03 04:17:49)
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi 
>>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
>>> index 4a56d9c..21c2399 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
>>> @@ -30,6 +31,18 @@
>>>                  };
>>>          };
>>>   +       reserved_memory: reserved-memory {
>>
>> Do we plan to use this label at any point? I'd prefer we remove this
>> until it becomes useful.
>
> sure, i'll drop it
>
>>
>>> +               #address-cells = <2>;
>>> +               #size-cells = <2>;
>>> +               ranges;
>>> +
>>> +               aop_cmd_db_mem: memory@80860000 {
>>> +                       reg = <0x0 0x80860000 0x0 0x20000>;
>>> +                       compatible = "qcom,cmd-db";
>>> +                       no-map;
>>> +               };
>>> +       };
>>> +
>>>          cpus {
>>>                  #address-cells = <2>;
>>>                  #size-cells = <0>;
>>> @@ -203,6 +229,7 @@
>>>                          interrupt-controller;
>>>                          #interrupt-cells = <2>;
>>>                          gpio-ranges = <&tlmm 0 0 175>;
>>> +                       wakeup-parent = <&pdc>;
>>>                            qup_uart5_default: qup-uart5-default {
>>>                                  pins = "gpio46", "gpio47";
>>> @@ -287,6 +314,23 @@
>>>                                  status = "disabled";
>>>                          };
>>>                  };
>>> +
>>> +               apps_rsc: rsc@18200000 {
>>
>> Any better name than 'rsc'? Maybe 'power-controller'?
>
> hmm, Maulik, any thoughts? This would perhaps need the bindings docs
> to be updated as well (and maybe the existing platform DTs using rsc too)

I think we should be good with rsc (resource-state-coordinator). RSC 
itself don't do any resource power management.

Thanks,
Maulik
>
>>
>>> +                       compatible = "qcom,rpmh-rsc";
>>> +                       reg = <0 0x18200000 0 0x10000>,
>>> +                             <0 0x18210000 0 0x10000>,
>>> +                             <0 0x18220000 0 0x10000>;
>>> +                       reg-names = "drv-0", "drv-1", "drv-2";
>>> +                       interrupts = <GIC_SPI 3 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> +                                    <GIC_SPI 4 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> +                                    <GIC_SPI 5 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>>> +                       qcom,tcs-offset = <0xd00>;
>>> +                       qcom,drv-id = <2>;
>>> +                       qcom,tcs-config = <ACTIVE_TCS 2>,
>>> +                                         <SLEEP_TCS 3>,
>>> +                                         <WAKE_TCS 3>,
>>> +                                         <CONTROL_TCS 1>;
>>> +               };
>>>          };
>
-- 
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation


  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-08  5:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-03 12:17 [PATCH v2 00/14] Add binding updates and DT files for SC7280 SoC Rajendra Nayak
2021-03-03 12:17 ` [PATCH v2 01/14] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: Document sc7280 SoC and board Rajendra Nayak
2021-03-08 20:09   ` Rob Herring
2021-03-03 12:17 ` [PATCH v2 02/14] dt-bindings: firmware: scm: Add sc7280 support Rajendra Nayak
2021-03-08 20:09   ` Rob Herring
2021-03-03 12:17 ` [PATCH v2 03/14] arm64: dts: sc7280: Add basic dts/dtsi files for sc7280 soc Rajendra Nayak
2021-03-04  0:07   ` Stephen Boyd
2021-03-11  9:18     ` Rajendra Nayak
2021-03-03 12:17 ` [PATCH v2 04/14] dt-bindings: qcom,pdc: Add compatible for sc7280 Rajendra Nayak
2021-03-08 20:09   ` Rob Herring
2021-03-03 12:17 ` [PATCH v2 05/14] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add RSC and PDC devices Rajendra Nayak
2021-03-04  0:04   ` Stephen Boyd
2021-03-05  5:42     ` Rajendra Nayak
2021-03-08  5:21       ` Maulik Shah [this message]
2021-03-23  7:06         ` Stephen Boyd
2021-03-03 12:17 ` [PATCH v2 06/14] arm64: dts: qcom: SC7280: Add rpmhcc clock controller node Rajendra Nayak
2021-03-04  0:04   ` Stephen Boyd
2021-03-03 12:17 ` [PATCH v2 07/14] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add compatible for SC7280 SoC Rajendra Nayak
2021-03-08 20:10   ` Rob Herring
2021-03-03 12:17 ` [PATCH v2 08/14] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add device node for APPS SMMU Rajendra Nayak
2021-03-03 12:17 ` [PATCH v2 09/14] arm64: dts: qcom: Add reserved memory for fw Rajendra Nayak
2021-03-03 12:17 ` [PATCH v2 10/14] dt-bindings: watchdog: Add compatible for SC7280 SoC Rajendra Nayak
2021-03-08 20:10   ` Rob Herring
2021-03-03 12:17 ` [PATCH v2 11/14] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add APSS watchdog node Rajendra Nayak
2021-03-03 12:17 ` [PATCH v2 12/14] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add SPMI PMIC arbiter device for SC7280 Rajendra Nayak
2021-03-04  0:12   ` Stephen Boyd
2021-03-05  5:44     ` Rajendra Nayak
2021-03-03 12:17 ` [PATCH v2 13/14] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add cpuidle states Rajendra Nayak
2021-03-04  0:13   ` Stephen Boyd
2021-03-05  5:44     ` Rajendra Nayak
2021-03-03 12:17 ` [PATCH v2 14/14] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add rpmh power-domain node Rajendra Nayak
2021-03-04  0:14   ` Stephen Boyd

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ac4f5cf8-0bf0-b7c3-2d50-ae7d48cbc885@codeaurora.org \
    --to=mkshah@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=agross@kernel.org \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rnayak@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).