From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mout-p-102.mailbox.org (mout-p-102.mailbox.org [80.241.56.152]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E4DE17B50F; Wed, 15 Oct 2025 14:33:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=80.241.56.152 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1760538802; cv=none; b=sZAQHzSwHVe3uiqq8kem+zkq6gR3SuT/lbe/QYGgYp8P13rmyJZcRpP4rh1r+3FsrmzSgTUS5zEVVXB0iOHGWG/58JoAaaeu3zrXZtOt3rYJulIVOWwK3Wz6xeJf/aSqlojalHt3gz+71KPJrWb3KYpQHV4cI2HFa5HFSs7FSN8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1760538802; c=relaxed/simple; bh=tDM0kU0b+a0XNq9PsdHCsruV9hc1JDceI75DKsbQfjE=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=kMNvx3I4kYKzjafMDbGDKSfusi1MlYwgSwEndHukru2jugZVEAlHiuxmK03zJhzd80sGF3SgR2DKqBNAS0uKl/W8vmsaD3ziC+LdseWqkhXqr4z2nMFgO32Ex8L4pXs6A5jJfWEBRzOp8UkhhaJDh64tRJoAhZ08NyyVFYmZu50= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=mailbox.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mailbox.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mailbox.org header.i=@mailbox.org header.b=wN7lqxX9; arc=none smtp.client-ip=80.241.56.152 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=mailbox.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mailbox.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mailbox.org header.i=@mailbox.org header.b="wN7lqxX9" Received: from smtp202.mailbox.org (smtp202.mailbox.org [10.196.197.202]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-102.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4cmtqJ5ghsz9v66; Wed, 15 Oct 2025 16:33:16 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mailbox.org; s=mail20150812; t=1760538796; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=p+0AAq5p9n3CYb0eN2KQBzPDtI3LpH6hBvgSrfcGzKs=; b=wN7lqxX9ujyaZAtI3oFJQBPbEbCEMBGULGgOFLBCY8XqGfDEy4VEj5OTv3D4U7tGelWb9+ StMm8aoZZcvrm9F7FXK+h/dd87S4E6C0WFcCWzepB33sy+b1zj6nhGPnXO82dXsPTsYosY Ud7bD3DHde2xmx+/bZrhYtSKMC8zU9dnKaiJDxWRPUPpBILy98OUUUa5ep2h2dF9VVcwkk wAX+kTD0D090Sy7/0bIEJZArrFjR9fB9m6/3c5fgSzAghzEkE9EzMcKYN34SBzaZnjFI6N WUAq+FAHm7mc4pGvhu15vOKy85e1gZt88Aer8pMJnVjgGGNfjhXIup6L4LHINw== Message-ID: Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2025 12:19:33 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/39] dt-bindings: display: imx: Document i.MX95 Display Controller processing units To: Liu Ying , Frank Li Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Abel Vesa , Conor Dooley , Fabio Estevam , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Laurent Pinchart , Lucas Stach , Peng Fan , Pengutronix Kernel Team , Rob Herring , Shawn Guo , Thomas Zimmermann , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org References: <20251011170213.128907-1-marek.vasut@mailbox.org> <20251011170213.128907-4-marek.vasut@mailbox.org> <260b4db1-c02a-48a0-baf8-5e217c729824@mailbox.org> Content-Language: en-US From: Marek Vasut In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MBO-RS-META: 3bfifor4uba8rjg7sfrfhsxrmksew5w3 X-MBO-RS-ID: f82c0904535502d82ca On 10/15/25 10:59 AM, Liu Ying wrote: Hello Liu, >>>> @@ -90,13 +102,15 @@ patternProperties: >>>> compatible: >>>> const: fsl,imx8qxp-dc-signature >>>> >>>> - "^tcon@[0-9a-f]+$": >>>> + "^tcon(@[0-9a-f]+)?$": >>> >>> why here allow no address unit tcon? >> This might be something Liu can clarify too. >> >> TCON on iMX95 DPU does not seem to exist at all, or at least has no control registers. Hence no address. > > i.MX95 DC hasn't got TCON so it should not be documented for i.MX95 DC. What DT node do I attach the pixel-mapper/pixel-interleaver to then ? -- Best regards, Marek Vasut