From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6E45305057; Fri, 24 Apr 2026 10:26:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777026409; cv=none; b=S0+dptC9cS+D3gy1bdrVIe9SkEG4x3qcu5n7Ix1GKYNesO5TtbXdCsnQ4e/65P19lJHq0a8jGZeaJFFbx0ndelLqwyX+GW0uRu7KXYT8OPdjqzJRC0K8HtFsRtmfu04yKNe4Ixn6XAhhehjSkjrtmotWXx1oWF5frTT+coxFNTQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777026409; c=relaxed/simple; bh=6qdpYOEwgLxns6uy+l3iZ48fFOnItLJCDfEcMjKyDwQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ri8f8CIGBSqVdG0MnvZCOy50Kgsg9APHC9cog44+fiK3aH5/tur3VY4Hdwzs8IUs+oH909aGHWlHy0L+x6YlB6q8k1+5fY9JUGd/ubWuTdWuhYLd4ZjD0UqV8fdi6XW8lC3VP/relFrdfinWtcK1RxQntkrvynoaB634fwU+9Hs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=SqWxIIF8; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="SqWxIIF8" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 09FC1C19425; Fri, 24 Apr 2026 10:26:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1777026409; bh=6qdpYOEwgLxns6uy+l3iZ48fFOnItLJCDfEcMjKyDwQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=SqWxIIF8IkQAlamNjybivRzR2oqo2uWMyT27bW2+eeH2feqVExPH6SkmOHTDCajrX kwvzpt5dUfEDtlC2Iz8UEuhVw7GUIZibf26c+b8Tkj4HPiPa1tz2ZakERzglgXau+R l9BJ+a4hKWVNpxMQazgIZEjDpAqHXs4zSm4tZ97xocyrAaDFhNisDEr4q4RDgBOjRv r25ottLx3ENqpUsssrQtFYxFGtsbfd8vF2mmw30v/JsvrAcDzgruIaN9djKuNIbbdE W9ZhmjycZ92cJW5v0kaZVoMEDcSCg7lREeic4LAfdeamPEQWkHfCMT2+ta+ZDKLysE tyfw2DbIyn1cA== Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2026 12:26:46 +0200 From: Uwe =?utf-8?Q?Kleine-K=C3=B6nig?= To: Ben Zong-You Xie Cc: Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] pwm: add support for Andes platform Message-ID: References: <20260330-andes-pwm-v5-0-01c59a659d2c@andestech.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dguxxe7wwxovvkw5" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: --dguxxe7wwxovvkw5 Content-Type: text/plain; protected-headers=v1; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] pwm: add support for Andes platform MIME-Version: 1.0 Hello Ben, On Fri, Apr 24, 2026 at 10:59:43AM +0800, Ben Zong-You Xie wrote: > Gentle ping on this series =E2=80=94 it's been ~4 weeks with no review on= the > PWM side. Patch 1 (binding) has Conor's ack; patch 2 (driver) has not > received any feedback yet. Unfortunately there is a conflict between wanting to do a detailed review and my time available for doing that. As long as your patch is listed on https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-pwm/list/ I havn't forgotten about it and will review it when I find the time for it (typically in a rough first-come-first-serve order, though I try to give simpler and urgent patches a preference.) So the obvious things you can do to speed up my processing are: - Look at the patches that are still before yours in the queue, find issues in them to kick them out of my queue :-) - With https://lore.kernel.org/all/7ia4o6kmpj5s.fsf@castle.c.googlers.com/ in place since you sent your v5, feel free to send a v6 and look through the feedback by Sashiko. It's an AI and not specifically trained to the things I care about, so only adapt to the points where you agree. The feedback it provided for other series as far as I skimmed it contains some good points. Best regards Uwe --dguxxe7wwxovvkw5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEP4GsaTp6HlmJrf7Tj4D7WH0S/k4FAmnrRWMACgkQj4D7WH0S /k5aZQgAq0AIXrRmD2GZhd1ZgZCcs8Sce1N/uQ23PAKGDmq2PmvAkcN9re7EZ2BV 4Pl9SEWKZw1U0eMAPjHO+WaQrL0A3WQPOph8Pyinp+93agUK9klK06/UnFyTlxJP MmSE6BQKYYJUM61/1RgjnidWZdbvM9x9qd2W/0Fzoy77GcZA+aKv2Z2/NSIYoz1I 6C+OfF8QL2xv77rhDIbVRdbot8PxWE92nYB5WWt9sJrHwl0Nr6pt7wQc//JsLvGW P9SqDo4GeR9jqLKLGTA6P97jeWISwMKazC05rC89TQTLdJU7hO0aVxE+Izyn3ZUj Kvhmr07fSy5lUgx6//KgVHkFEXaYwA== =gE+6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --dguxxe7wwxovvkw5--