From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E4A1CA0EC3 for ; Tue, 12 Sep 2023 09:36:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232504AbjILJgq (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Sep 2023 05:36:46 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47422 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231234AbjILJgm (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Sep 2023 05:36:42 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x32c.google.com (mail-wm1-x32c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD57512E for ; Tue, 12 Sep 2023 02:36:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm1-x32c.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-401187f8071so34283705e9.0 for ; Tue, 12 Sep 2023 02:36:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; t=1694511397; x=1695116197; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=I2E1gO44gErvLCsLkrEiV4IXvDnQB78+GoWRxTmFEOc=; b=CCwAPZ9j+KS8qsxwr3/KiFhre/dOcV9GbRErTdYdrP5HxazJnO2+WXaSbi6gqfQNfZ XAJS/BndpMZIJYXTyAjOAqdzXL9NMeDVQ9z13o4GpS/h64vpL4+S6hWwINCVcWOHZEQA u17lmS6ADplFa6S8/SEaecZ5LRgnDrXuHpe6xbjQyJh94kC5q2KMuSz8jWGgDGCQlLuC EQyVyNcdmqjZDuvz2oRnx5xY08gFSQFf/2/plnpZ5Eevn5v0v9YM8lk2jjBbjQzNl/dc nrusjDM3fwiS5ZkM1X+CYfUtv2i4eGgQLP83a2XLO8CuFr3xkrNtDAPvA1/tK2t2yc4l yxYw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1694511397; x=1695116197; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=I2E1gO44gErvLCsLkrEiV4IXvDnQB78+GoWRxTmFEOc=; b=rpc7MHkgVr9EXJjOLj8eqyMkaXUK/M54BcTmjV1ZuXqDKKkLfnv10C/cNSzjQ8/RH2 mlNXuD/KsD+OJDDuJiOcUiQbS55UtBw+c5XIIqHnfT1C/QaWwhUImjaToELl260eATR8 i5PwRTTl3oi12nRo9j4zoTXmfGjn0kX1YgAyejSRWutDZIHj3uLWpn3FAVcpAQAFY0Jv 1SHU7INQULFAuZhN/hMPhc9svkpRFwjiKeZX6ph80GzckXMaoaKyJrp6if9aVJm/vKxa 3yz81xF0JbrMwbovZwORjKyS3EIZFudURkt4zv/3kIiL9A0NhYIWDA5mUbJIUK+hQY7B GzXQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YytZYzcBJXrQiVA4Bh9hZM8gxGiKcurxGQ+VLX/QSSNB7ha5iDW WZKTAYCZe6f/eYpqyCsramoxRA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGjBJQH7mzQfXAu5lgRUFXAuZoXiTMnNJmrtnG9tLxPqOp7DMt1gBEzDZ1OIOn09IbXJS1ing== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:4e50:b0:401:b393:da18 with SMTP id e16-20020a05600c4e5000b00401b393da18mr1425536wmq.6.1694511397094; Tue, 12 Sep 2023 02:36:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.20] ([178.197.214.188]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o8-20020a1c7508000000b003fed7fa6c00sm15780383wmc.7.2023.09.12.02.36.34 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 12 Sep 2023 02:36:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 11:36:33 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: imx8mp: add reserve-memory nodes for DSP Content-Language: en-US To: Iuliana Prodan , "Iuliana Prodan (OSS)" , Mathieu Poirier , robh+dt@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, Shawn Guo , Bjorn Andersson , Sascha Hauer , "S.J. Wang" , Fabio Estevam , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Baluta , Mpuaudiosw Cc: linux-imx , linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Pengutronix Kernel Team , LnxRevLi References: <20230911224452.15739-1-iuliana.prodan@oss.nxp.com> <20230911224452.15739-3-iuliana.prodan@oss.nxp.com> <67de5706-d966-dd71-85c3-c95bc1b72733@linaro.org> <32287c0a-e3c1-e474-3c90-913fe2c79879@linaro.org> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 12/09/2023 10:49, Iuliana Prodan wrote: >>> Should I test this on other tree(s)? >> You test the patch on the tree you send it. What is the point to test it >> on some old code, cherry-pick with bugs and then send? >> >> If you have cross-tree dependencies between subsystem, isn't linux-next >> for this? > > TBH, I don't know, that's why I asked. > > For sure one patch is for remoteproc. > For the other, I don't know who will pick it, but I'll tested on > linux-next, as you suggested. MAINTAINERS file (and get_maintainers.pl) will tell you. Specifically, this does not look really related to remoteproc patch, so it should not be together in one patchset. Best regards, Krzysztof