From: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
pabeni@redhat.com, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org,
conor+dt@kernel.org, ansuelsmth@gmail.com,
benjamin.larsson@genexis.eu,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, madhur.agrawal@airoha.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 05/10] net: airoha: Move qos_sq_bmap in airoha_qdma struct
Date: Sat, 9 May 2026 09:54:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <af7oPWp43eMDmolL@lore-desk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260509014609.3558041-1-kuba@kernel.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6609 bytes --]
On May 08, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this
> email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible.
> ---
> net: airoha: Move qos_sq_bmap in airoha_qdma struct
>
> The change moves the HTB-offload channel-allocation bitmap from the
> per-netdev airoha_gdm_port to the per-QDMA airoha_qdma, so sibling
> netdevs attached to different QDMA blocks no longer clobber each other's
> bitmap.
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.c
> > index 080705e2f58d..69a4c2e0d58b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.c
> > @@ -2600,7 +2600,7 @@ static int airoha_tc_htb_alloc_leaf_queue(struct net_device *netdev,
> > u32 rate = div_u64(opt->rate, 1000) << 3; /* kbps */
> > int err, num_tx_queues = netdev->real_num_tx_queues;
> > struct airoha_gdm_dev *dev = netdev_priv(netdev);
> > - struct airoha_gdm_port *port = dev->port;
> > + struct airoha_qdma *qdma = dev->qdma;
> >
> > if (opt->parent_classid != TC_HTB_CLASSID_ROOT) {
> > NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(opt->extack, "invalid parent classid");
> > @@ -2627,7 +2627,7 @@ static int airoha_tc_htb_alloc_leaf_queue(struct net_device *netdev,
> > return err;
> > }
> >
> > - set_bit(channel, port->qos_sq_bmap);
> > + set_bit(channel, qdma->qos_sq_bmap);
> > opt->qid = AIROHA_NUM_TX_RING + channel;
> >
> > return 0;
>
> [High]
> Now that qos_sq_bmap is per-QDMA, can two sibling netdevs that share the
> same QDMA block collide on allocation? On EN7581, GDM2/GDM3/GDM4 all
> select the same qdma pointer via:
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.c:
> /* QDMA0 is used for lan ports while QDMA1 is used for WAN ports */
> dev->qdma = ð->qdma[!airoha_is_lan_gdm_dev(dev)];
>
> and airoha_is_lan_gdm_dev() returns true only for port->id == 1, so
> every non-LAN GDM netdev resolves to eth->qdma[1] and shares
> qdma->qos_sq_bmap.
>
> The allocation path does not test the bit before setting it:
>
> channel = TC_H_MIN(opt->classid) % AIROHA_NUM_QOS_CHANNELS;
> ...
> set_bit(channel, qdma->qos_sq_bmap);
> opt->qid = AIROHA_NUM_TX_RING + channel;
>
> If two sibling netdevs on the same QDMA pick classids whose TC_H_MIN
> maps to the same channel, both airoha_qdma_set_tx_rate_limit() calls
> program the same HW TRTCM egress slot, the later caller silently
> overwrites the earlier configuration, and both netdevs receive the same
> opt->qid. Should this path use test_and_set_bit() (or similar owner
> tracking) to reject a channel already owned by a sibling netdev?
ack, I think we should move qos_sq_bmap in airoha_gdm_dev struct and track if a
shared qdma qos channel is already in use. I will fix it in v5.
>
> > @@ -2811,11 +2811,11 @@ static int airoha_dev_setup_tc_block(struct net_device *dev,
> > static void airoha_tc_remove_htb_queue(struct net_device *netdev, int queue)
> > {
> > struct airoha_gdm_dev *dev = netdev_priv(netdev);
> > - struct airoha_gdm_port *port = dev->port;
> > + struct airoha_qdma *qdma = dev->qdma;
> >
> > netif_set_real_num_tx_queues(netdev, netdev->real_num_tx_queues - 1);
> > airoha_qdma_set_tx_rate_limit(netdev, queue + 1, 0, 0);
> > - clear_bit(queue, port->qos_sq_bmap);
> > + clear_bit(queue, qdma->qos_sq_bmap);
> > }
>
> [High]
> airoha_tc_remove_htb_queue() operates unconditionally on the caller's
> netdev but clears a bit that may be owned by a sibling netdev on the
> same QDMA. The effects that follow look like cross-netdev interference:
>
> - netif_set_real_num_tx_queues(netdev, real_num_tx_queues - 1)
> decrements the caller's tx-queue count for a queue it never
> allocated, and its return value is discarded (eventually the txq<1
> EINVAL guard in netif_set_real_num_tx_queues() will trip silently).
>
> - airoha_qdma_set_tx_rate_limit(netdev, queue + 1, 0, 0) zeros the
> egress TRTCM rate-limit registers for a channel that the sibling
> netdev still considers active.
>
> - clear_bit(queue, qdma->qos_sq_bmap) then hides the channel from the
> legitimate owner's later test_bit() checks.
This issue will be fixed by the change described above. I will fix it in v5.
>
> > @@ -2838,10 +2838,10 @@ static int airoha_tc_htb_delete_leaf_queue(struct net_device *netdev,
> > static int airoha_tc_htb_destroy(struct net_device *netdev)
> > {
> > struct airoha_gdm_dev *dev = netdev_priv(netdev);
> > - struct airoha_gdm_port *port = dev->port;
> > + struct airoha_qdma *qdma = dev->qdma;
> > int q;
> >
> > - for_each_set_bit(q, port->qos_sq_bmap, AIROHA_NUM_QOS_CHANNELS)
> > + for_each_set_bit(q, qdma->qos_sq_bmap, AIROHA_NUM_QOS_CHANNELS)
> > airoha_tc_remove_htb_queue(netdev, q);
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
>
> [High]
> Does airoha_tc_htb_destroy() now walk bits owned by sibling netdevs?
> The iteration no longer filters by owning netdev:
>
> for_each_set_bit(q, qdma->qos_sq_bmap, AIROHA_NUM_QOS_CHANNELS)
> airoha_tc_remove_htb_queue(netdev, q);
>
> Previously each netdev had a private bitmap, so destroy could only
> touch its own channels. After this change, tearing down HTB on one
> GDM netdev appears to remove channels and clear rate-limit HW state
> belonging to every sibling GDM netdev on the same QDMA. A subsequent
> tc-htb delete or get on the legitimate owner then hits:
>
> if (!test_bit(channel, qdma->qos_sq_bmap)) {
> NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(opt->extack, "invalid queue id");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> Should the bitmap track the owning netdev alongside the bit (for
> example a per-channel owner pointer, or a per-netdev sub-bitmap inside
> airoha_qdma), so that destroy/delete can only touch channels owned by
> the caller?
This issue will be fixed by the change described above. I will fix it in v5.
Regards,
Lorenzo
>
> > @@ -2852,9 +2852,9 @@ static int airoha_tc_get_htb_get_leaf_queue(struct net_device *netdev,
> > {
> > u32 channel = TC_H_MIN(opt->classid) % AIROHA_NUM_QOS_CHANNELS;
> > struct airoha_gdm_dev *dev = netdev_priv(netdev);
> > - struct airoha_gdm_port *port = dev->port;
> > + struct airoha_qdma *qdma = dev->qdma;
> >
> > - if (!test_bit(channel, port->qos_sq_bmap)) {
> > + if (!test_bit(channel, qdma->qos_sq_bmap)) {
> > NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(opt->extack, "invalid queue id");
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-09 7:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-07 21:21 [PATCH net-next v4 00/10] net: airoha: Support multiple net_devices connected to the same GDM port Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-05-07 21:21 ` [PATCH net-next v4 01/10] dt-bindings: net: airoha: Add EN7581 ethernet-ports properties Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-05-07 21:21 ` [PATCH net-next v4 02/10] net: airoha: Introduce airoha_gdm_dev struct Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-05-07 21:21 ` [PATCH net-next v4 03/10] net: airoha: Move airoha_qdma pointer in " Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-05-09 1:46 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-05-09 6:17 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-05-07 21:21 ` [PATCH net-next v4 04/10] net: airoha: Rely on airoha_gdm_dev pointer in airhoa_is_lan_gdm_port() Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-05-07 21:21 ` [PATCH net-next v4 05/10] net: airoha: Move qos_sq_bmap in airoha_qdma struct Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-05-09 1:46 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-05-09 7:54 ` Lorenzo Bianconi [this message]
2026-05-09 13:08 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-05-07 21:21 ` [PATCH net-next v4 06/10] net: airoha: Move {cpu,fwd}_tx_packets " Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-05-09 12:14 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-05-07 21:21 ` [PATCH net-next v4 07/10] net: airoha: Support multiple net_devices for a single FE GDM port Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-05-09 1:46 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-05-09 8:25 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-05-07 21:21 ` [PATCH net-next v4 08/10] net: airoha: Do not stop GDM port if it is shared Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-05-09 1:46 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-05-09 9:00 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-05-09 11:58 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-05-07 21:21 ` [PATCH net-next v4 09/10] net: airoha: Introduce WAN device flag Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-05-09 1:46 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-05-09 9:42 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-05-07 21:21 ` [PATCH net-next v4 10/10] net: airoha: Support multiple LAN/WAN interfaces for hw MAC address configuration Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-05-09 1:46 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-05-09 10:07 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=af7oPWp43eMDmolL@lore-desk \
--to=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=ansuelsmth@gmail.com \
--cc=benjamin.larsson@genexis.eu \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=madhur.agrawal@airoha.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox