From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 816BF2E7F0A; Sat, 9 May 2026 07:58:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778313490; cv=none; b=TfpGhP6ufGpJ3kAQbNuTXd8b4NbVmVMSmZmWTlFZ8laIJqzze4Sj6kcE7T7W6ED3fpNvfnOL8NU6c+iKOsLtllgPShj33yxcHiuHTvSUnyziXoeDeADlTPXxAOErqTOAehvo96Pdh8esWmQYv10pwirKvd3Ngj8Xmdoh5ZB0frg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778313490; c=relaxed/simple; bh=MdCI2/PrT8C7efYvGDIg7YuQIc2xsx6L5N5jVNcdWZE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=GYBw6FfkTZn8sngEk5IWmT/pYowMHa/GtKlRybElJowOITlSZ8r6I2x+YwS4Sg6P0trS8+fAxAdpnUkjVyuxrO7NvvrJp0fGI0Po/eUE3Wxo2fjzK0SEt6KNu2YqXv6FHU7Rl4KBTxsaoOAkVmrTS+qFDeZW1URJGnD6jgFxVVk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=mdenArNN; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="mdenArNN" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1778313489; x=1809849489; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=MdCI2/PrT8C7efYvGDIg7YuQIc2xsx6L5N5jVNcdWZE=; b=mdenArNNd/EY9TGVDf5XKjkScvmJyc8Psc6+BXO84EV+zYkXnuDy8uiP F7FYuoqS8bOgL/QcBtDNG86HWTpywtB8z7C6O+rsjUXTqD/ZizckEg72p U5hbPds1USqdhfY+A5xWv08+Pansv85OPPvSxRV8hdYqkt6/d7ESE5m0B mAjrHl9JvSGNR8f/qyMy9cDB9yGyF9V4rTuR8iGUGZPCfdkXa0+itcINX 4CLs7MgSDsQe5nwrwPxJgaGXNzOu4poAdI10SNjtujTohQG3MpBVJpKl9 6OzKG8k+A3MUI8j8PR6ulyNGF2kCTAHArp9ffZlTzzbhC4aYBcXgYj4DU A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 0mhWhU+JQ9qkYKexsqpQMg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: DMwVVjLnR5+pix0+PwBIXw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11780"; a="78419515" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,225,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="78419515" Received: from fmviesa001.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.141]) by fmvoesa112.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 May 2026 00:58:08 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: mnKnG3ZlTuaWvv//70uMoQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: t4CFqf7eQDmO+2HPZHHOwA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,225,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="260701818" Received: from pgcooper-mobl3.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.244.146]) by smtpauth.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 May 2026 00:58:05 -0700 Date: Sat, 9 May 2026 10:58:03 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Vlad Cc: jic23@kernel.org, dlechner@baylibre.com, nuno.sa@analog.com, andy@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] iio: magnetometer: add MEMSIC MMC5983MA driver Message-ID: References: <20260507205033.951990-1-vlad.kulikov.c@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Fri, May 08, 2026 at 01:40:17PM +0300, Vlad wrote: > On Fri, May 8, 2026 at 1:03 PM Andy Shevchenko > wrote: > > My comment from v1 still applies. Note, when sending a new version of a driver > > like this, give approximately as many days as hundreds of LoC in it. > > The bare minimum 24h anyway. > > Thanks, understood about the revision cadence. I will wait longer before > sending the next version. > > I did include a short explanation in patch 1/2, but I see that it should > also be visible in the cover letter for a new driver series. Unless you > think the existing note in patch 1/2 is sufficient, I will add a > dedicated "why a new driver" section to the cover letter in v3. I'm waiting for this before reviewing. I.o.w. it's crucial to me to even start the review round. It's up to you what to do on this. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko