From: Wandun <chenwandun1@gmail.com>
To: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
robh@kernel.org, saravanak@kernel.org, rppt@kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] of: reserved_mem: skip init for regions whose early reservation failed
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 21:04:18 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <af87036b-0809-4880-b088-545780b4d963@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <72074a49-2963-4f96-b939-79bf95a829cb@samsung.com>
On 8/26/26 21:14, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> On 18.08.2026 11:24, Wandun Chen wrote:
>> From: Wandun Chen <chenwandun@lixiang.com>
>>
>> __reserved_mem_reserve_reg() discards the error from
>> early_init_dt_reserve_memory() and returns 0 unconditionally, so the
>> caller counts the node in total_reserved_mem_cnt and the late scan
>> initializes it without checking whether the early reservation actually
>> succeeded. A region whose reservation failed is then handed to a
>> device assuming the memory is protected.
>>
>> Propagate the error so failed reservations are no longer counted, and
>> record the failed nodes so fdt_scan_reserved_mem_late() can skip them.
>>
>> Recording the failed nodes explicitly is necessary because
>> fdt_scan_reserved_mem_late() rescans the DT independently. It cannot
>> tell from memblock whether early reservation succeeded.
>>
>> The failed-node array is bounded by MAX_RESERVED_REGIONS, the number
>> of static regions is not bounded by it, so on overflow the extra nodes
>> fall back to being initialized, which is the current behavior.
>
> I'm not very keen on such partial solution. Indeed we have no place to
>
> store the result of the early init call, but we can check if the given
>
> region has been earlier marked in memblock as reserved or no-map in
>
> fdt_scan_reserved_mem_late(). If those attributes don't match the
>
> region can be simply skipped then.
Considering the later patches that reject reservations for overlapping
nodes, checking the memblock state in fdt_scan_reserved_mem_late() may
produce false positives.
For example, if region A is reserved first and region B is a subset of
A, reserving B will fail because it overlaps with A (in patch 02/03).
However, during fdt_scan_reserved_mem_late(), B will still appear to
be reserved because its range is already covered by A. As a result,
B would be initialized even though its own reservation failed, which
is contrary to the intended behavior.
Best regards
Wandun
>
>
>> Fixes: 8a6e02d0c00e ("of: reserved_mem: Restructure how the reserved memory regions are processed")
>> Signed-off-by: Wandun Chen <chenwandun@lixiang.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>> 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c b/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c
>> index 8c9d6395d6a3..c6e73d710ee1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c
>> +++ b/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c
>> @@ -32,6 +32,30 @@ static struct reserved_mem *reserved_mem __refdata = reserved_mem_array;
>> static int total_reserved_mem_cnt = MAX_RESERVED_REGIONS;
>> static int reserved_mem_count;
>>
>> +static int reserve_failed_nodes[MAX_RESERVED_REGIONS] __initdata;
>> +static int reserve_failed_nodes_cnt __initdata;
>> +
>> +static bool __init reserved_mem_node_reserve_failed(int node)
>> +{
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < reserve_failed_nodes_cnt; i++)
>> + if (reserve_failed_nodes[i] == node)
>> + return true;
>> + return false;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static bool __init record_reserve_failed_node(int node, const char *uname)
>> +{
>> + if (reserve_failed_nodes_cnt == MAX_RESERVED_REGIONS) {
>> + pr_err("too many failed regions, '%s' reservation failed\n", uname);
>> + return false;
>> + }
>> +
>> + reserve_failed_nodes[reserve_failed_nodes_cnt++] = node;
>> + return true;
>> +}
>> +
>> static int __init early_init_dt_alloc_reserved_memory_arch(phys_addr_t size,
>> phys_addr_t align, phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end, bool nomap,
>> phys_addr_t *res_base)
>> @@ -141,7 +165,8 @@ static int __init early_init_dt_reserve_memory(phys_addr_t base,
>> * first entry in 'reg' property
>> */
>> static int __init __reserved_mem_reserve_reg(unsigned long node,
>> - const char *uname)
>> + const char *uname,
>> + bool *should_record_failed_node)
>> {
>> phys_addr_t base, size;
>> int len, err;
>> @@ -149,6 +174,8 @@ static int __init __reserved_mem_reserve_reg(unsigned long node,
>> bool nomap;
>> u64 b, s;
>>
>> + *should_record_failed_node = false;
>> +
>> prop = of_flat_dt_get_addr_size_prop(node, "reg", &len);
>> if (!prop || !len)
>> return -ENOENT;
>> @@ -167,14 +194,20 @@ static int __init __reserved_mem_reserve_reg(unsigned long node,
>> base = b;
>> size = s;
>>
>> - if (size && early_init_dt_reserve_memory(base, size, nomap) == 0) {
>> - fdt_fixup_reserved_mem_node(node, base, size);
>> - pr_debug("Reserved memory: reserved region for node '%s': base %pa, size %lu MiB\n",
>> - uname, &base, (unsigned long)(size / SZ_1M));
>> - } else {
>> + if (!size)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + err = early_init_dt_reserve_memory(base, size, nomap);
>> + if (err) {
>> + *should_record_failed_node = true;
>> pr_err("Reserved memory: failed to reserve memory for node '%s': base %pa, size %lu MiB\n",
>> uname, &base, (unsigned long)(size / SZ_1M));
>> + return err;
>> }
>> +
>> + fdt_fixup_reserved_mem_node(node, base, size);
>> + pr_debug("Reserved memory: reserved region for node '%s': base %pa, size %lu MiB\n",
>> + uname, &base, (unsigned long)(size / SZ_1M));
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -306,10 +339,14 @@ void __init fdt_scan_reserved_mem_late(void)
>> base = b;
>> size = s;
>>
>> - if (size) {
>> - uname = fdt_get_name(fdt, child, NULL);
>> - fdt_init_reserved_mem_node(child, uname, base, size);
>> - }
>> + if (!size)
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + if (reserved_mem_node_reserve_failed(child))
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + uname = fdt_get_name(fdt, child, NULL);
>> + fdt_init_reserved_mem_node(child, uname, base, size);
>> }
>>
>> /* check for overlapping reserved regions */
>> @@ -349,6 +386,7 @@ int __init fdt_scan_reserved_mem(void)
>>
>> fdt_for_each_subnode(child, fdt, node) {
>> const char *uname;
>> + bool should_record_failed_node;
>> int err;
>>
>> if (!of_fdt_device_is_available(fdt, child))
>> @@ -356,9 +394,14 @@ int __init fdt_scan_reserved_mem(void)
>>
>> uname = fdt_get_name(fdt, child, NULL);
>>
>> - err = __reserved_mem_reserve_reg(child, uname);
>> + err = __reserved_mem_reserve_reg(child, uname,
>> + &should_record_failed_node);
>> if (!err)
>> count++;
>> + else if (should_record_failed_node &&
>> + !record_reserve_failed_node(child, uname))
>> + /* Keep a slot for the untracked node's late initialization. */
>> + count++;
>>
>> /*
>> * Save the nodes for the dynamically-placed regions
>
> Best regards
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-31 13:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-18 9:24 [PATCH v2 0/5] of: reserved_mem: several fixes about reserved memory Wandun Chen
2026-08-18 9:24 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] of: reserved_mem: skip init for regions whose early reservation failed Wandun Chen
2026-08-26 13:14 ` Marek Szyprowski
2026-08-31 13:04 ` Wandun [this message]
2026-09-04 8:49 ` Marek Szyprowski
2026-08-18 9:24 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] of: reserved_mem: reject static regions overlapping no-map memory Wandun Chen
2026-08-18 9:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-19 2:26 ` Wandun
2026-08-26 13:16 ` Marek Szyprowski
2026-08-18 9:24 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] of: reserved_mem: reject statically placed regions overlapping existing reservations Wandun Chen
2026-08-18 9:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-19 3:00 ` Wandun
2026-08-26 13:16 ` Marek Szyprowski
2026-08-18 9:24 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] of: reserved_mem: release dynamically allocated no-map region on init failure Wandun Chen
2026-08-18 9:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-19 3:14 ` Wandun
2026-08-26 13:17 ` Marek Szyprowski
2026-08-18 9:24 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] of: reserved_mem: retain static no-map memory " Wandun Chen
2026-08-18 9:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-19 3:16 ` Wandun
2026-08-26 13:18 ` Marek Szyprowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=af87036b-0809-4880-b088-545780b4d963@gmail.com \
--to=chenwandun1@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=saravanak@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox