Devicetree
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Varadarajan Narayanan <varadarajan.narayanan@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
	Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: qcom,ipq8074-qmp-pcie: Document the ipq5210 QMP PCIe PHY
Date: Fri, 15 May 2026 16:20:25 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <agb6cSAul9aLbnh9@hu-varada-blr.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260515-optimistic-hedgehog-of-penetration-b34227@quoll>

On Fri, May 15, 2026 at 12:47:00PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Thu, May 14, 2026 at 09:28:28AM +0530, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
> > Document the PCIe phy on the ipq5210 platform using the ipq9574 bindings
> > as a fallback, since the PCIe phy on the ipq5210 is similar to ipq9574.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Varadarajan Narayanan <varadarajan.narayanan@oss.qualcomm.com>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,ipq8074-qmp-pcie-phy.yaml | 3 +++
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,ipq8074-qmp-pcie-phy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,ipq8074-qmp-pcie-phy.yaml
> > index f60804687412..1ac31439c20a 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,ipq8074-qmp-pcie-phy.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,ipq8074-qmp-pcie-phy.yaml
> > @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ properties:
> >    compatible:
> >      oneOf:
> >        - enum:
> > +          - qcom,ipq5210-qmp-gen3x1-pcie-phy
>
> 5210-qmp-gen3x1 here
>
> >            - qcom,ipq6018-qmp-pcie-phy
> >            - qcom,ipq8074-qmp-gen3-pcie-phy
> >            - qcom,ipq8074-qmp-pcie-phy
> > @@ -24,10 +25,12 @@ properties:
> >            - qcom,ipq9574-qmp-gen3x2-pcie-phy
> >        - items:
> >            - enum:
> > +              - qcom,ipq5210-qmp-gen3x1-pcie-phy
>
> and here?
>
> >                - qcom,ipq5424-qmp-gen3x1-pcie-phy
> >            - const: qcom,ipq9574-qmp-gen3x1-pcie-phy
>
> So it is or it is not compatible with 9574?

Sorry. It is compatible with 9574. Will fix this and post a new version.

Thanks
Varada

  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-15 10:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-14  3:58 [PATCH 0/2] Enable the QMP PCIe PHY present in Qualcomm ipq5210 SoC Varadarajan Narayanan
2026-05-14  3:58 ` [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: qcom,ipq8074-qmp-pcie: Document the ipq5210 QMP PCIe PHY Varadarajan Narayanan
2026-05-14 12:05   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-15 10:45   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-05-15 10:47   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-05-15 10:50     ` Varadarajan Narayanan [this message]
2026-05-14  3:58 ` [PATCH 2/2] phy: qcom-qmp-pcie: Add support for ipq5210 PCIe phys Varadarajan Narayanan
2026-05-14 12:52   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=agb6cSAul9aLbnh9@hu-varada-blr.qualcomm.com \
    --to=varadarajan.narayanan@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=krzk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox