Devicetree
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
To: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
	 Frank Wang <frank.wang@rock-chips.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	 Andy Yan <andy.yan@rock-chips.com>,
	Dmitry Baryshkov <lumag@kernel.org>,
	 Yubing Zhang <yubing.zhang@rock-chips.com>,
	Alexey Charkov <alchark@gmail.com>,
	 linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	 linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@collabora.com,
	 devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 07/16] phy: rockchip: usbdp: Support single-lane DP
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2026 17:57:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aiwrNQhPsqlqDB-Z@venus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f29df43b-111d-471b-8579-0196596fc32b@linaro.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2156 bytes --]

Hi,

On Wed, May 06, 2026 at 04:53:07PM +0200, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> > @@ -537,6 +538,13 @@ static void rk_udphy_usb_bvalid_enable(struct rk_udphy *udphy, u8 enable)
> >    * <0 1>                  dpln0         dpln1       usbrx         usbtx
> >    * <2 3>                  usbrx         usbtx       dpln0         dpln1
> >    * ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > + * if 1 lane for dp function, 2 lane for usb function, define rockchip,dp-lane-mux = <x>;
> > + * sample as follow:
> > + * ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > + *                        B11-B10       A2-A3       A11-A10       B2-B3
> > + * rockchip,dp-lane-mux   ln0(tx/rx)    ln1(tx)     ln2(tx/rx)    ln3(tx)
> > + * <0>                    dpln0         \           usbrx         usbtx
> > + * ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >    */
> >   static void rk_udphy_dplane_select(struct rk_udphy *udphy)
> > @@ -544,18 +552,18 @@ static void rk_udphy_dplane_select(struct rk_udphy *udphy)
> >   	const struct rk_udphy_cfg *cfg = udphy->cfgs;
> >   	u32 value = 0;
> > -	switch (udphy->mode) {
> > -	case UDPHY_MODE_DP:
> > -		value |= 2 << udphy->dp_lane_sel[2] * 2;
> > +	switch (udphy->dp_lanes) {
> > +	case 4:
> >   		value |= 3 << udphy->dp_lane_sel[3] * 2;
> > +		value |= 2 << udphy->dp_lane_sel[2] * 2;
> >   		fallthrough;
> > -	case UDPHY_MODE_DP_USB:
> > -		value |= 0 << udphy->dp_lane_sel[0] * 2;
> > +	case 2:
> >   		value |= 1 << udphy->dp_lane_sel[1] * 2;
> > -		break;
> > +		fallthrough;
> > -	case UDPHY_MODE_USB:
> > +	case 1:
> > +		value |= 0 << udphy->dp_lane_sel[0] * 2;
> 
> What's the point of keeping this no-op calculation ?

This function is cleaned up in a later patch to no longer have the
switch/case at all ("Cleanup DP lane selection function"). I kept
the no-op calculation here, since it IMHO makes it easier to understand
the cleanup patch and will be optimized away by the compiler anyways.

(I will send out a new patch series in a jiffy)

Greetings,

-- Sebastian

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-12 15:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-28 16:13 [PATCH v4 00/16] phy: rockchip: usbdp: Fixes, DP 1-lane support and cleanups Sebastian Reichel
2026-04-28 16:13 ` [PATCH v4 01/16] dt-bindings: phy: rockchip-usbdp: add improved ports scheme Sebastian Reichel
2026-05-05 15:44   ` Rob Herring
2026-05-05 15:45   ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2026-04-28 16:13 ` [PATCH v4 02/16] phy: rockchip: usbdp: Do not loose USB3 PHY status Sebastian Reichel
2026-05-06 14:47   ` Neil Armstrong
2026-04-28 16:13 ` [PATCH v4 03/16] phy: rockchip: usbdp: Keep clocks running on PHY re-init Sebastian Reichel
2026-05-06 14:49   ` Neil Armstrong
2026-04-28 16:13 ` [PATCH v4 04/16] phy: rockchip: usbdp: Amend SSC modulation deviation Sebastian Reichel
2026-05-06 14:49   ` Neil Armstrong
2026-04-28 16:13 ` [PATCH v4 05/16] phy: rockchip: usbdp: Fix LFPS detect threshold control Sebastian Reichel
2026-05-06 14:49   ` Neil Armstrong
2026-04-28 16:13 ` [PATCH v4 06/16] phy: rockchip: usbdp: Add missing mode_change update Sebastian Reichel
2026-05-06 14:50   ` Neil Armstrong
2026-04-28 16:13 ` [PATCH v4 07/16] phy: rockchip: usbdp: Support single-lane DP Sebastian Reichel
2026-05-06 14:53   ` Neil Armstrong
2026-06-12 15:57     ` Sebastian Reichel [this message]
2026-04-28 16:13 ` [PATCH v4 08/16] phy: rockchip: usbdp: Rename DP lane functions Sebastian Reichel
2026-05-06 14:53   ` Neil Armstrong
2026-04-28 16:13 ` [PATCH v4 09/16] phy: rockchip: usbdp: Use FIELD_PREP_WM16_CONST Sebastian Reichel
2026-05-06 14:54   ` Neil Armstrong
2026-04-28 16:13 ` [PATCH v4 10/16] phy: rockchip: usbdp: Cleanup DP lane selection function Sebastian Reichel
2026-05-06 14:55   ` Neil Armstrong
2026-04-28 16:13 ` [PATCH v4 11/16] phy: rockchip: usbdp: Register DP aux bridge Sebastian Reichel
2026-05-06 14:56   ` Neil Armstrong
2026-04-28 16:13 ` [PATCH v4 12/16] phy: rockchip: usbdp: Drop DP HPD handling Sebastian Reichel
2026-04-28 16:13 ` [PATCH v4 13/16] phy: rockchip: usbdp: Rename mode_change to phy_needs_reinit Sebastian Reichel
2026-04-28 16:13 ` [PATCH v4 14/16] phy: rockchip: usbdp: Re-init the PHY on orientation change Sebastian Reichel
2026-04-28 16:13 ` [PATCH v4 15/16] phy: rockchip: usbdp: Factor out lane_mux_sel setup Sebastian Reichel
2026-04-28 16:13 ` [PATCH v4 16/16] phy: rockchip: usbdp: Use guard functions for mutex Sebastian Reichel
2026-05-03 16:50 ` [PATCH v4 00/16] phy: rockchip: usbdp: Fixes, DP 1-lane support and cleanups Vinod Koul
2026-05-03 19:12   ` Heiko Stuebner
2026-05-10  7:32     ` Vinod Koul

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aiwrNQhPsqlqDB-Z@venus \
    --to=sebastian.reichel@collabora.com \
    --cc=alchark@gmail.com \
    --cc=andy.yan@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=frank.wang@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=kernel@collabora.com \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lumag@kernel.org \
    --cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    --cc=yubing.zhang@rock-chips.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox