From: Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@gmail.com>
To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev, Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, vkoul@kernel.org,
neil.armstrong@linaro.org, olteanv@gmail.com, robh@kernel.org,
conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] phy: spacemit: Add USB3/PCIe comb PHY driver for Spacemit K3
Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2026 09:59:03 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <akm5-xLZgFPLKeE4@inochi.infowork> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260703021929.15FDE1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org>
On Fri, Jul 03, 2026 at 02:19:28AM +0000, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
> - [High] Hardware register clobbering due to missing read-modify-write operations in PHY initialization.
> --
>
> commit c71cb5c4ebfcb4fc5aff5c18a7769949e15dae55
> Author: Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@gmail.com>
>
> phy: spacemit: Add USB3/PCIe comb PHY driver for Spacemit K3
>
> Adds a USB3/PCIe comb PHY driver for Spacemit K3. The comb PHY requires
> configuring a syscon device for the correct mux configuration and needs
> calibration before usage.
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/phy/spacemit/phy-k3-common.c b/drivers/phy/spacemit/phy-k3-common.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000000000..0b289e63db999
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/phy/spacemit/phy-k3-common.c
>
> [ ... ]
>
> > + /* Power down 100MHz refclk buffer */
> > + val = readl(base + PHY_PU_CK_REG);
> > + val = u32_replace_bits(val, 0, PHY_PU_REFCLK_100);
> > + writel(val, base + PHY_PU_CK_REG);
> > +
> > + /* Program PLL REG1 configure the SSC */
> > + val = FIELD_PREP(PHY_PLL_SSC_MODE, PHY_PLL_SSC_MODE_DOWN_SPREAD1) |
> > + FIELD_PREP(PHY_PLL_SSC_DEP_SEL, PHY_PLL_SSC_5000PPM) |
> > + FIELD_PREP(PHY_PLL_FREF_SEL, PHY_PLL_FREF_24M);
> > + writel(val, base + PHY_PLL_REG1);
>
> [Severity: High]
> Does this completely overwrite PHY_PLL_REG1 and zero out unspecified bits?
>
No, All the field are filled, so no data is lost.
> Unlike the PCIe initialization path which uses a read-modify-write for this
> register, this direct writel() in k3_usb3phy_init_single() clobbers the
> entire register. Could this cause important default settings or calibration
> values to be lost?
>
> [ ... ]
>
> > + for (i = 0; i < lg->data->lanes; i++) {
> > + void __iomem *lane_base = lg->base + lg->data->offsets[i];
> > +
> > + val = readl(lane_base + PCIE_RX_REG1);
> > + val = u32_replace_bits(val, 0, 0x3);
> > + writel(val, lane_base + PCIE_RX_REG1);
> > + }
> > +
> > + val = readl(phy_base + PHY_PLL_REG2);
> > + val |= BIT(20);
> > + writel(val, phy_base + PHY_PLL_REG2);
> > +
> > + /* The write is needed as clock requires renegotiation */
> > + val = FIELD_PREP(PCIE_RX_REFCLK_MODE, PCIE_RX_REFCLK_MODE_DRIVER) |
> > + PCIE_RX_SEL_TRI_CODE |
> > + FIELD_PREP(PCIE_RX_LEGACY, PCIE_RX_LEGACY_DEFAULT);
> > + writel(val, phy_base + PCIE_RX_REG1);
>
> [Severity: High]
> Does this clobber the entire PCIE_RX_REG1 register for lane 0?
>
This also serves as the whole clock. If the phy has two lanes, they share some
data and the data is store at lane 0.
> The preceding loop performs a read-modify-write on PCIE_RX_REG1 for all lanes,
> but this direct writel() on phy_base (which points to lane 0) invalidates
> that previous work and zeroes out any bits not explicitly set here.
>
> Should this also use a read-modify-write operation to preserve the register
> state?
>
No, it is not needed, as all the field are filled or it should be zero.
> --
> Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260703021024.495433-1-inochiama@gmail.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-05 1:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-03 2:10 [PATCH v2 0/2] riscv: spacemit: Add K3 PCIe/USB comb phy support Inochi Amaoto
2026-07-03 2:10 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: Add Spacemit K3 USB3/PCIe " Inochi Amaoto
2026-07-03 2:10 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] phy: spacemit: Add USB3/PCIe comb PHY driver for Spacemit K3 Inochi Amaoto
2026-07-03 2:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-05 1:59 ` Inochi Amaoto [this message]
2026-07-03 17:12 ` Aurelien Jarno
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=akm5-xLZgFPLKeE4@inochi.infowork \
--to=inochiama@gmail.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox