From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Guennadi Liakhovetski Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] ARM: shmobile: Add DT table of INTC for sh7372 Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 10:34:12 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: References: <1355562224-29448-1-git-send-email-horms+renesas@verge.net.au> <1355562224-29448-6-git-send-email-horms+renesas@verge.net.au> <20121218003717.GI7146@verge.net.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20121218003717.GI7146@verge.net.au> Sender: linux-sh-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Simon Horman Cc: Simon Horman , linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, Paul Mundt , Magnus Damm , Bastian Hecht , Nobuhiro Iwamatsu , Magnus Damm List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Simon On Tue, 18 Dec 2012, Simon Horman wrote: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 09:44:10AM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > Hi Simon > > > > On Sat, 15 Dec 2012, Simon Horman wrote: > > > > > From: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu > > > > > > Cc: Magnus Damm > > > Signed-off-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu > > > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman > > > > What happened to intcs support? Why has it been dropped? Without it many > > important devices cannot be set up from DT, e.g. I2C #0. > > INTCS support is still being worked on and doesn't seem to be > quite ready yet. I am aware that this limits the usefulness of > this series. But it is a step in the right direction. What are the problems with it? My patch series uses INTCS support from the previous version of this patch-set, so, now, without INTCS, I'll have to remove from .dts I2C0 and all devices on it. Thanks Guennadi --- Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D. Freelance Open-Source Software Developer http://www.open-technology.de/