From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.83]:28778 "EHLO mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755438Ab3HMG31 (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Aug 2013 02:29:27 -0400 Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 08:29:24 +0200 (CEST) From: Julia Lawall Subject: Re: question about netif_rx In-Reply-To: <20130813052036.GA11640@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> Message-ID: References: <20130811155640.GA10070@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> <20130813052036.GA11640@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="8323328-1654509347-1376375365=:1997" Sender: devicetree-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Francois Romieu Cc: Julia Lawall , grant.likely@linaro.org, rob.herring@calxeda.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-ID: This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --8323328-1654509347-1376375365=:1997 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Tue, 13 Aug 2013, Francois Romieu wrote: > Julia Lawall : > > François Romieu : > [...] > > > Can you send a netif_receive_skb replacement patch for it ? > > > > Just to be sure, I just replace netif_rx by netif_receive_skb, nothing > > else? > > Yes. It should imho be fine with a comment incluing your analysis and a > few words about the current state of checksum offloading support. I wouldn't know what to say about the checksum part. It is not supported so I should use netif_receive_skb? thanks, julia --8323328-1654509347-1376375365=:1997--