From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: atull Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] pmbus: ltc2978: add regulator support Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 09:54:52 -0500 Message-ID: References: <1413399310-19277-1-git-send-email-atull@opensource.altera.com> <20141016212415.GA27469@roeck-us.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20141016212415.GA27469@roeck-us.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Guenter Roeck Cc: jdelvare@suse.de, lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org, lgirdwood@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, galak@codeaurora.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, delicious.quinoa@gmail.com, dinguyen@opensource.altera.com, yvanderv@opensource.altera.com List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 16 Oct 2014, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 01:55:06PM -0500, atull@opensource.altera.com wrote: > > From: Alan Tull > > > > Each output has individual on/off control. > > > > New in v6: > > * Much cleanup of the bindings document > > * s/vout_en/vout/g > > > > Hopefully this is getting closer. We will still have the potential problem of > > repeated node names on boards on boards that have many regulators of the same > > kind. If this can be handled in the regulator layer, that might be great. > > If we handle it here, whatever we come up with will have to keep the same > > name over reboots and be predictable enough to serve as regulator node names > > in the DT. I'm open for suggestions here. > > > > This patchset now uses "regulator: of: Provide simplified DT parsing method" > > which are in the next-20141014 tag of linux-next. > > > Hi Alan, > > Since the problems we have seen are in the regulator core code and not > in your patches, I added the series to -next. I fixed up the 'compatible' > example in the devicetree description, so there is no need to resubmit > the patches. > > Thanks, > Guenter > Hi Guenter, Thanks! Alan