From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julia Lawall Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] hwmon: (lm70) Utilize dev_warn instead of pr_warn Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 13:00:35 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: References: <20170121192010.30681-1-f.fainelli@gmail.com> <20170121192010.30681-2-f.fainelli@gmail.com> <1485153837.12563.23.camel@perches.com> <1485154594.12563.27.camel@perches.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1485154594.12563.27.camel@perches.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Joe Perches Cc: Florian Fainelli , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Jean Delvare , Guenter Roeck , Jonathan Corbet , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , "open list:HARDWARE MONITORING" , "open list:DOCUMENTATION" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 22 Jan 2017, Joe Perches wrote: > On Sun, 2017-01-22 at 22:43 -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > > Two questions for Julia Lawall: > > > > o is there a better way to do this than repeat the blocks > > one for each replacement > > o can struct device * dev be made an arbitrary identifier > > > > $ cat dev_printk.cocci > > @@ > > identifier fn; > > type T; > > @@ > > > > T fn ( ..., struct device * dev, ... ) { > > <... > > - pr_emerg( > > + dev_emerg(dev, > > ...); > > ...> > > } > > Well, the second question is simple if I would just > think a little before asking... > > @@ > identifier fn; > identifier dev; Yes :) julia > type T; > @@ > > T fn ( ..., struct device * dev, ... ) { > <... > - pr_emerg( > + dev_emerg(dev, > ...); > ...> > } > > etc... > >