From: Piotr Bugalski <bugalski.piotr@gmail.com>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
Cc: Piotr Bugalski <bugalski.piotr@gmail.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@microchip.com>,
Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] New QuadSPI driver for Atmel SAMA5D2
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 12:52:07 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1806211239590.28763@carbonite> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180620165438.39608554@bbrezillon>
Hi Boris,
Thank you very much for quick response.
On Wed, 20 Jun 2018, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> Hi Piotr,
>
> On Mon, 18 Jun 2018 18:21:22 +0200
> Piotr Bugalski <bugalski.piotr@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Atmel SAMA5D2 is equipped with two QSPI interfaces. These interfaces can
>> work as in SPI-compatible mode or use two / four lines to improve
>> communication speed. At the moment there is QSPI driver strongly tied to
>> NOR-flash memory and MTD subsystem.
>> Intention of this change is to provide new driver which will not be tied
>> to MTD and allows using QSPI with NAND-flash memory or other peripherals
>> New spi-mem API provides abstraction layer which can disconnect QSPI
>> from MTD. This driver doesn't support regular SPI interface, it should
>> be used with spi-mem interface only.
>
> Glad to see that people are starting to convert their SPI NOR
> controller drivers to the SPI mem approach.
>
>> Unfortunately SAMA5D2 hardware by default supports only NOR-flash
>> memory. It allows 24- and 32-bit addressing while NAND-flash requires
>> 16-bit long. To workaround hardware limitation driver is a bit more
>> complicated.
>>
>> Request to spi-mem contains three fiels: opcode (command), address,
>> dummy bytes. SAMA5D2 QSPI hardware supports opcode, address, dummy and
>> option byte where address field can only be 24- or 32- bytes long.
>> Handling 8-bits long addresses is done using option field. For 16-bits
>> address behaviour depends of number of requested dummy bits. If there
>> are 8 or more dummy cycles, address is shifted and sent with first dummy
>> byte. Otherwise opcode is disabled and first byte of address contains
>> command opcode (works only if opcode and address use the same buswidth).
>> The limitation is when 16-bit address is used without enough dummy
>> cycles and opcode is using different buswidth than address. Other modes
>> are supported with described workaround.
>>
>> It looks like hardware has some limitation in performance. The same issue
>> exists in current QSPI driver (MTD/nor-flash) and soft-pack (bare-metal
>> library from Atmel). Without using DMA read speed is much worse than
>> maximum bandwidth (efficiency 30-40%). Any help with performance
>> improvement is highly welcome, especially for NAND-flash memories which
>> offers higher capacity than NOR-flash used with previous driver.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Piotr
>>
>> Piotr Bugalski (2):
>> spi: Add QuadSPI driver for Atmel SAMA5D2
>> dt-bindings: spi: QuadSPI driver for Atmel SAMA5D2 documentation
>>
>> .../devicetree/bindings/spi/spi_atmel-qspi.txt | 41 ++
>> drivers/spi/Kconfig | 9 +
>> drivers/spi/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/spi/spi-atmel-qspi.c | 480 +++++++++++++++++++++
>
> I'd like a solution where we remove the old driver. I definitely don't
> want to have both in parallel. Did you test the new driver with a SPI
> NOR to check if it still works correctly? If you did, then I'd suggest
> that you add a patch updating defconfigs where the SPI_ATMEL_QUADSPI is
> selected and another patch removing the old driver.
>
I misunderstood a bit your idea. My main concern was NAND-flash with
QSPI interface and I expected original nor-flash driver to stay
untouched - at least now. However idea of replacement older driver
with spi-mem approach makes a lot of sense to me.
I'll test nor-flash with new driver first, it should work but I prefer
to be sure. In next version I'll follow your suggestion and replace
old nor-flash driver.
>> 4 files changed, 531 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi_atmel-qspi.txt
>
> This should be a simple mv from
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/atmel-quadspi.txt to
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-atmel-qspi.txt
>
>> create mode 100644 drivers/spi/spi-atmel-qspi.c
>>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Boris
>
Thank you for comments,
Piotr
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-21 10:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-18 16:21 [RFC PATCH 0/2] New QuadSPI driver for Atmel SAMA5D2 Piotr Bugalski
2018-06-18 16:21 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] spi: Add " Piotr Bugalski
2018-06-19 15:15 ` Mark Brown
2018-06-20 14:31 ` Piotr Bugalski
2018-06-21 21:33 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-06-22 5:57 ` Piotr Bugalski
2018-06-22 7:39 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-06-26 14:44 ` Tudor Ambarus
2018-06-27 7:52 ` Piotr Bugalski
2018-06-28 8:37 ` Tudor Ambarus
2018-06-28 12:02 ` Piotr Bugalski
2018-06-18 16:21 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: spi: QuadSPI driver for Atmel SAMA5D2 documentation Piotr Bugalski
2018-06-20 14:47 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-06-21 10:56 ` Piotr Bugalski
2018-06-20 14:54 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] New QuadSPI driver for Atmel SAMA5D2 Boris Brezillon
2018-06-21 10:52 ` Piotr Bugalski [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.20.1806211239590.28763@carbonite \
--to=bugalski.piotr@gmail.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=boris.brezillon@bootlin.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=cyrille.pitchen@microchip.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=tudor.ambarus@microchip.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox