From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] irq-imgpdc: add ImgTec PDC irqchip driver
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 11:32:30 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1304241128320.21884@ionos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5177A262.1000004@imgtec.com>
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013, James Hogan wrote:
> Thanks for the review Thomas!
>
> On 23/04/13 16:09, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Tue, 23 Apr 2013, James Hogan wrote:
>> + spinlock_t lock;
> >
> > raw_spinlock_t please
>
> Okay.
>
> If I understand right, this would be because on RT, spinlock_t becomes a
> mutex and won't work correctly with irqs actually disabled for the irq
> callbacks below, is that right?
Yep.
> I'll look into this. kernel/irq/generic-chip.c was added after this
> driver was written.
Fair enough.
> >> +static void pdc_intc_perip_isr(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
> >> +{
> >> + struct pdc_intc_priv *priv;
> >> + unsigned int i, irq_no;
> >> +
> >> + priv = (struct pdc_intc_priv *)irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
> >> +
> >> + /* find the peripheral number */
> >> + for (i = 0; i < priv->nr_perips; ++i)
> >> + if (irq == priv->perip_irqs[i])
> >> + goto found;
> >
> > Whee. Aren't these numbers linear ?
>
> Not necessarily as they're virtual irq numbers obtained via
> platform_get_irq(), which come individually from device tree. Even their
> hardware irq numbers aren't linear as they're not wired to their irqchip
> in the same order:
> > pdc: pdc@0x02006000 {
> > interrupt-controller;
> > #interrupt-cells = <3>;
> >
> > reg = <0x02006000 0x1000>;
> > compatible = "img,pdc-intc";
> >
> > num-perips = <3>;
> > num-syswakes = <3>;
> >
> > interrupts = <18 4 /* level */>, /* Syswakes */
> > <30 4 /* level */>, /* Perip 0 (RTC) */
> > <29 4 /* level */>, /* Perip 1 (IR) */
> > <31 4 /* level */>; /* Perip 2 (WDT) */
> > };
Interesting.
> >> +static int pdc_intc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> +{
> >> + struct pdc_intc_priv *priv = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> >> +
> >> + irq_domain_remove(priv->domain);
> >
> > And the rest of the resources is still there?
>
> I was under the impression devm_kzalloc and devm_ioremap took care of
> that in both the probe error case and the remove case:
> > * devm_kzalloc - Resource-managed kzalloc
> > * Managed kzalloc. Memory allocated with this function is
> > * automatically freed on driver detach.
> >
> > * devm_ioremap - Managed ioremap()
> > * Managed ioremap(). Map is automatically unmapped on driver detach.
>
> I may have misunderstood the whole point of their existence though?
No, that was just me missing the devm_ in front of
kzalloc/ioremap. So you're good.
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-24 9:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-23 14:33 [PATCH 0/8] Add some TZ1090 SoC infrastructure James Hogan
2013-04-23 14:33 ` [PATCH 2/8] metag: minimal TZ1090 (Comet) " James Hogan
2013-04-23 15:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-23 16:06 ` James Hogan
2013-04-24 13:26 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-04-24 14:51 ` James Hogan
2013-04-25 15:21 ` James Hogan
2013-04-23 14:33 ` [PATCH 3/8] irq-imgpdc: add ImgTec PDC irqchip driver James Hogan
2013-04-23 15:09 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-04-24 9:14 ` James Hogan
2013-04-24 9:32 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2013-04-25 11:25 ` James Hogan
2013-04-23 14:33 ` [PATCH 4/8] metag: tz1090: add <asm/soc-tz1090/gpio.h> James Hogan
2013-04-25 21:52 ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-23 14:33 ` [PATCH 5/8] pinctrl-tz1090: add TZ1090 pinctrl driver James Hogan
2013-04-25 22:39 ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-26 11:54 ` James Hogan
2013-05-03 9:13 ` Linus Walleij
2013-05-03 12:23 ` James Hogan
2013-05-03 13:03 ` Linus Walleij
2013-05-03 15:06 ` James Hogan
[not found] ` <5183D262.7000107-1AXoQHu6uovQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-05-14 11:52 ` Linus Walleij
2013-05-14 12:22 ` James Hogan
2013-05-15 19:07 ` Linus Walleij
2013-05-16 9:12 ` James Hogan
2013-05-17 6:47 ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-23 14:33 ` [PATCH 6/8] gpio-tz1090: add TZ1090 gpio driver James Hogan
2013-04-25 23:01 ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-26 9:22 ` James Hogan
2013-05-03 8:49 ` Linus Walleij
2013-05-03 9:09 ` James Hogan
2013-05-15 19:09 ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-23 14:33 ` [PATCH 7/8] pinctrl-tz1090-pdc: add TZ1090 PDC pinctrl driver James Hogan
[not found] ` <1366727607-27444-1-git-send-email-james.hogan-1AXoQHu6uovQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-04-23 14:33 ` [PATCH 1/8] metag: of_platform_populate from arch generic code James Hogan
2013-04-23 14:33 ` [PATCH 8/8] gpio-tz1090pdc: add TZ1090 PDC gpio driver James Hogan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.02.1304241128320.21884@ionos \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
--cc=rob@landley.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).