Re: [PATCH 7/9] arm: twr-k70f120m: IOMUX driver for Kinetis SoC

[Paul Osmialowski <pawelo@king.net.pl>]

Hi Linus,

On Tue, 14 Jul 2015, Linus Walleij wrote:

> OK...
> 
> I want Shawn and Sascha to look at this as they worked with
> other Freescale pin controllers. Especially I want to know if this
> is a sibling to the other Freescale controllers or a separate hardware.
> 
> If it is *not* a sibling I will *insist* that it use more generic pin
> control bindings and move away from the older Freescale-specific
> stuff.

No one answered me about that. However, I looked at other Freescale 
pinctrl drivers and realised that no one of them (IMX, IMX1, MXS) is 
similar to what I need to do for Kinetis, also positions of configuration 
bits differ significantly.

> 
> There exist generic pin config bindings, see
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-bindings.txt
> 
> I suggest to to function+group paring and then use generic pin config
> with this driver unless it is a very close sibling to the existing Freescale
> pin controllers.
> 
> Hint: if it is a sibling, it should share code with them.
> 
> There are several drivers doing generic pin control/pin config in the kernel
> tree.
> 

I tried to analyze few of the drivers (e.g. zynq family) and can't find 
how can I assing clock gate (clock device) to each port (PORTA, PORTB, 
PORTC,...) which is required for Kinetis. Is generic pin control capable 
to express that requirement or is it a time to desing my own pinctrl 
driver (maybe somewhat improved than the one I presented so far)?

This pinctrl component is somwehat critical part of BSP. Until it is not 
sorted, I don't see a point in releasing what was developed so far.

Best regards,
Paul