From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@kernel.org>
To: Hao-Qun Huang <alvinhuang0603@gmail.com>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@nvidia.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: media: tegra-video: fix of_node_put() on VIP parse errors
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2026 18:24:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ameBr5oM8pp4PpiQ@orome> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260707150326.554689-1-alvinhuang0603@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2021 bytes --]
On Tue, Jul 07, 2026 at 11:03:26PM +0800, Hao-Qun Huang wrote:
> tegra_vip_channel_of_parse() initializes np from dev->of_node without
> taking a reference, but its error paths drop one through the
> err_node_put label. This underflows the refcount of the VIP device's
> OF node when endpoint parsing fails on a malformed device tree.
>
> The only reference the function takes on np is the success-path
> of_node_get() stored in vip->chan.of_node, and that one is already
> released by the tegra_vip_init() error path and by tegra_vip_exit().
>
> Return errors directly instead of jumping to the bogus cleanup label.
>
> Fixes: e740d199cf0f ("staging: media: tegra-video: add support for Tegra20 parallel input")
> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-fable-5
> Signed-off-by: Hao-Qun Huang <alvinhuang0603@gmail.com>
I suppose this is a common pattern, but isn't this technically broken?
If we were really pedantic I think we'd need to grab a reference to the
node very early in the function, like so:
struct device_node *np = of_node_get(dev->of_node);
And then make sure to release it on error (and hold on to it on success
and release it on remove). For kobject/kref, unless you hold a reference
to them they can disappear at any time.
That said, of_node_get() doesn't fully support this, it seems. It would
need to do kobject_get_unless_zero() to be fully sure we get a valid OF
node.
Rob, I have seen these kinds of reference leak fixes a number of times
now but they just don't seem to be fully correct. I know that OF_DYNAMIC
probably isn't a very common configuration and so we might not run into
most of these issues. However, I wonder if there generally is a problem,
or if I just don't understand this correctly and there's some other
mechanism that makes sure these references stay around while the code
uses them without their own reference. I guess maybe as long as we run
code as part of probe we can rely on the struct device hanging on to its
reference?
Thierry
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-27 16:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
[parent not found: <20260707150326.554689-1-alvinhuang0603@gmail.com>]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ameBr5oM8pp4PpiQ@orome \
--to=thierry.reding@kernel.org \
--cc=alvinhuang0603@gmail.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=digetx@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hverkuil@kernel.org \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=skomatineni@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox