Devicetree
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Antoni Pokusinski <apokusinski01@gmail.com>
To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev
Cc: robh@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org,
	 Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/8] rtc: abx80x: replace read-modify-write pattern with regmap helpers
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2026 22:57:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <anEAX5qGZzIGH02T@antoniarch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260731190137.E8A701F00AC4@smtp.kernel.org>

On Fri, Jul 31, 2026 at 07:01:37PM +0000, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
> - [High] Using `guard(mutex)` inside a `switch` statement case without an enclosing block causes a compilation failure (or uninitialized cleanup execution).
> - [High] Configuration Key unlock sequence is broken by unprotected concurrent reads and newly introduced read-modify-write regmap helpers.
> --
> 
> --- Patch [6]: [PATCH v3 6/8] rtc: abx80x: replace read-modify-write pattern with regmap helpers ---
> commit 68e1add63890d6b130ad7ce142d172f06e590b90
> Author: Antoni Pokusinski <apokusinski01@gmail.com>
> 
> rtc: abx80x: replace read-modify-write pattern with regmap helpers
> 
> This commit replaces manual read-modify-write register operations in the 
> rtc-abx80x driver with regmap_update_bits() and regmap_write_bits() 
> functions to simplify the code.
> 
> > diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-abx80x.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-abx80x.c
> > index 23823fc2f5458..52f958e2aecd2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-abx80x.c
> > +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-abx80x.c
> [ ... ]
> > @@ -371,7 +364,7 @@ static int abx80x_rtc_set_autocalibration(struct device *dev,
> >  					  int autocalibration)
> >  {
> [ ... ]
> >  	/* Unlock write access to Oscillator Control Register */
> >  	if (abx80x_write_config_key(dev, ABX8XX_CFG_KEY_OSC) < 0)
> >  		return -EIO;
> >  
> > -	retval = regmap_write(priv->regmap, ABX8XX_REG_OSC, flags);
> > -
> > -	return retval;
> > +	return regmap_write_bits(priv->regmap, ABX8XX_REG_OSC,
> > +				 ABX8XX_OSC_ACAL_1024 | ABX8XX_OSC_ACAL_512,
> > +				 flags);
> >  }
> 
> [Severity: High]
> Does switching to regmap_write_bits() break the configuration key unlock
> sequence here?
> 
> The hardware requires writing the configuration key immediately before 
> writing a protected register. If any other register is accessed in between, 
> the unlock state is cleared. 
> 
> Because regmap_write_bits() performs a read operation internally before 
> writing, does that read happen after the configuration key is written,
> causing the hardware to relock itself before the write can execute?
> 
> Additionally, can an unlocked concurrent read sequence interleave here and
> clear the unlock state? Looking at abx80x_rtc_read_time(), it performs I2C 
> reads without taking priv->lock:
> 
> abx80x_rtc_read_time() {
>     ...
>     err = regmap_bulk_read(priv->regmap, ABX8XX_REG_HTH, buf, sizeof(buf));
>     ...
> }
Same answer as in patch 2 ("rtc: abx80x: add mutex protection for register writes"):
register reads do not cause a reset of the configuration key, so no
issue here.
> 
> [ ... ]
> > @@ -566,17 +545,8 @@ static int abx80x_ioctl(struct device *dev, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> >  	case RTC_VL_CLR:
> >  		guard(mutex)(&priv->lock);
> >  
> > -		err = regmap_read(priv->regmap, ABX8XX_REG_STATUS, &status);
> > -		if (err < 0)
> > -			return err;
> > -
> > -		status &= ~ABX8XX_STATUS_BLF;
> > -
> > -		err = regmap_write(priv->regmap, ABX8XX_REG_STATUS, status);
> > -		if (err < 0)
> > -			return err;
> > -
> > -		return 0;
> > +		return regmap_update_bits(priv->regmap, ABX8XX_REG_STATUS,
> > +					  ABX8XX_STATUS_BLF, 0);
> >  
> >  	default:
> >  		return -ENOIOCTLCMD;
> >  	}
> 
> [Severity: High]
> Will this cause a compiler error or undefined behavior?
> 
> The guard(mutex) is declared inside the case block, but without an 
> enclosing scope. If cmd is an unhandled ioctl, the switch statement jumps 
> to the default label, bypassing the initialization of the guard(mutex) 
> variable. 
> 
> Does this require adding braces around the RTC_VL_CLR case to restrict the 
> lifetime of the guard?
> 
> -- 
> Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260731184831.44037-1-apokusinski01@gmail.com?part=6

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-03 20:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-31 18:48 [PATCH v3 0/8] rtc: abx80x: add support for abx81x Antoni Pokusinski
2026-07-31 18:48 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] dt-bindings: rtc: abx80x: document ABX81X RTCs Antoni Pokusinski
2026-07-31 18:57   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-31 18:48 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] rtc: abx80x: add mutex protection for register writes Antoni Pokusinski
2026-07-31 19:02   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 20:48     ` Antoni Pokusinski
2026-07-31 18:48 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] rtc: abx80x: properly handle shared IRQs Antoni Pokusinski
2026-07-31 19:05   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 21:05     ` Antoni Pokusinski
2026-07-31 18:48 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] rtc: abx80x: add irq to struct abx80x_priv Antoni Pokusinski
2026-07-31 19:04   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 20:31     ` Antoni Pokusinski
2026-07-31 18:48 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] rtc: abx80x: use regmap instead of I2C specific API Antoni Pokusinski
2026-07-31 19:05   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 20:53     ` Antoni Pokusinski
2026-07-31 18:48 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] rtc: abx80x: replace read-modify-write pattern with regmap helpers Antoni Pokusinski
2026-07-31 19:01   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 20:57     ` Antoni Pokusinski [this message]
2026-07-31 18:48 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] rtc: abx80x: create abx80x_i2c_probe() Antoni Pokusinski
2026-07-31 19:02   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-31 18:48 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] rtc: abx80x: add support for ABX81X Antoni Pokusinski
2026-07-31 19:05   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=anEAX5qGZzIGH02T@antoniarch \
    --to=apokusinski01@gmail.com \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox